ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[gnso-travel-dt]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [gnso-travel-dt] Summary of today's Travel Support Call with Kevin Wilson

  • To: Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>, <gnso-travel-dt@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: [gnso-travel-dt] Summary of today's Travel Support Call with Kevin Wilson
  • From: Stéphane Van Gelder <stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 14 May 2009 19:44:10 +0200

You're very brave getting up at that time for that call.

I was really looking for direction on where to take the travel funding
debate from here and I didn't get that on this call, which was basically a
"heads-up, this is what we're doing for the coming fiscal year" from ICANN,
but none of the more central questions like who should get funded and how to
stop the inevitable escalation of funding requests.

So no clearly defined questions I'm afraid, but maybe a call for more
discussion on this in Sydney...

Stéphane


Le 14/05/09 19:19, « Avri Doria » <avri@xxxxxxx> a écrit :

> 
> hi,
> 
> assuming i can get myself up a 5am tomorrow morning, i plan to
> participating in that call.
> 
> so if there is stuff you want shy and reticent  little 'ole me to ask.
> let me know.
> 
> a.
> 
> On 14 May 2009, at 18:21, Stéphane Van Gelder wrote:
> 
>> I have to admit I found the call very disappointing.
>> 
>> There was no real discussion on the core travel funding issues and
>> the only part of interest was Kevin¹s explanation of what ICANN is
>> planning for the next fiscal year.
>> 
>> Tim¹s summary is spot on.
>> 
>> Stéphane
>> 
>> 
>> Le 14/05/09 18:15, « Olga Cavalli » <olgac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> a écrit :
>> 
>>> Thanks Tim for the update, very helpful.
>>> It seems that the travel support situation is better now for GNSO.
>>> 
>>> As for the drafting team activities, we cuould review the outcome
>>> text by 25 May and then decide if we want to make comments as a
>>> council or not.
>>> 
>>> Any other comments?
>>> 
>>> Best regards
>>> Olga
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 2009/5/14 Tim Ruiz <tim@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>> 
>>>> A transcript of the call will be available and Glen sent Kevin's
>>>> presentation to both lists. But, as promised, here is a brief
>>>> summary:
>>>> 
>>>> The proposed support for FY10 is:
>>>> GNSO increased from 13 to 23 (includes the NCAs)
>>>> ccNSO stays flat at 12
>>>> ASO stays flat at 6
>>>> GAC increased from 0 to 6
>>>> At Large stays flat 23 (15 ALAC, 8 RALO)
>>>> SSAC stays flat at 0
>>>> RSSAC stays flat at 0
>>>> Total per meeting from 54 to 70
>>>> Travel budget for FY10 1.72mil USD, up from 1.45mil USD in FY09
>>>> 
>>>> Staff is working on an Exceptions Policy for timing conflicts,
>>>> want to
>>>> book their own travel, find less expensive arrangements, etc.
>>>> 
>>>> Staff is still looking into questions on per diems, visa expenses,
>>>> class
>>>> of travel, and remote participation.
>>>> 
>>>> A full draft of the FY10 Travel Support Guidelines will be posted
>>>> by 25
>>>> May for public comment, with a final Guidelines and Summary for
>>>> Seoul by
>>>> 30 June.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Tim
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
> 
> 






<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy