<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [gnso-udrp-dt] Action Items From Today's Call
- To: <tim@xxxxxxxxxxx>, <wendy@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [gnso-udrp-dt] Action Items From Today's Call
- From: "Taylor, David" <David.Taylor@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2011 12:48:10 +0200
Tim, Wendy
Thanks for your input. I think all viewpoints are welcomed. On our call of
yesterday we did not exclude sending the questionnaire to others, simply
thought that the current UDRP providers likely to be one of the best sources of
data in the first instance. Do let Margie know of others we could send it to.
David
David Taylor
Partner
Hogan Lovells International LLP
6 Avenue Kléber, 75116 Paris, France
Tel:+33 (0) 1 53 67 47 47
Fax:+33 (0) 1 53 67 47 48
Email:drd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
www.hoganlovells.com
From: Tim Ruiz [mailto:tim@xxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Tuesday, April 05, 2011 12:26 PM
To: wendy@xxxxxxxxxxx <wendy@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: gnso-udrp-dt@xxxxxxxxx <gnso-udrp-dt@xxxxxxxxx>; Margie.Milam@xxxxxxxxx
<Margie.Milam@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: [gnso-udrp-dt] Action Items From Today's Call
I agree with Wendy. It sounds like the focus is on providers only.
Tim
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: Re: [gnso-udrp-dt] Action Items From Today's Call
> From: Wendy Seltzer
> Date: Mon, April 04, 2011 4:26 pm
> To: Margie Milam
> Cc: "gnso-udrp-dt@xxxxxxxxx"
>
> I'm sorry I had to miss the call. Did the group consider reaching out
> through our networks to find additional viewpoints? For example,
> academics who have studied the UDRP, and individuals who have been in
> domain name disputes but who have not been represented by attorneys.
>
> Thanks,
> --Wendy
>
> On 04/04/2011 05:15 PM, Margie Milam wrote:
> > Dear All,
> >
> > Here is a brief summary of the action item's resulting from today's call:
> >
> >
> > * David Taylor, John Berard, and I will work together to draft a
> > questionnaire to send to each of the UDRP providers in the next few days,
> > to be sent out as soon as possible.
> >
> > * We will schedule an initial webinar for late/April early March, for 90
> > minutes, organized as follows:
> >
> > o Each UDRP provider will be allocated five minutes to address how to make
> > the UDPR more efficient, and to discuss/rank their top issues for
> > improvements the UDRP (total of 20 min).
> >
> > o Each UDRP provider will be asked to recommend two panelists, from which a
> > few speakers would be selected (for a total of 20 min) to discuss their
> > issues
> >
> > o Each UDRP provider will also be asked to recommend two attorneys- one
> > that regularly represents complainants, and one that regularly represents
> > respondents, from which a few speakers would be selected (for a total of 20
> > min) to discuss their issues
> >
> > o Remainder of the webinar for audience input
> >
> > * The purpose of the initial webinar is to help frame the issues for the
> > drafting of the Issue Report. There will be additional opportunities for
> > providers/panelists to provide information throughout this process,
> > including, through scheduling a session in Singapore and additional
> > webinars, and during the PDP itself should one be commenced.
> >
> > * It was suggested that a "Preliminary Issue Report" be published after the
> > initial webinar, in time for the Singapore Meeting, and the opening of a
> > public comment period that would run through and after the Singapore
> > Meeting. After that, a "Final Issue Report" would be presented to the
> > Council, which would incorporate comments received during the Singapore
> > session and the public comment period.
> >
> > * Regarding additional documents to review- the IRT/STI comments filed
> > during the public comment period for references to issues related to the
> > UDRP, and WIPO's recently published annual report on its UDRP cases.
> >
> > Finally, Gisella will send around a doodle for next week Tues/Wed, for a
> > follow-up call.
> >
> > Best regards,
> > Margie
> > ______
> >
> > Margie Milam
> > Senior Policy Counselor
> > ICANN
> > ______
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Wendy Seltzer -- wendy@xxxxxxxxxxx +1 914-374-0613
> Fellow, Princeton Center for Information Technology Policy
> Fellow, Berkman Center for Internet & Society at Harvard University
> http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/seltzer.html
> https://www.chillingeffects.org/
> https://www.torproject.org/
> http://www.freedom-to-tinker.com/
________________________________________
Hogan Lovells (Paris) LLP is a limited liability partnership registered in
England and Wales
with registered number OC353350
Hogan Lovells refers to the international legal practice comprising Hogan
Lovells International
LLP, Hogan Lovells US LLP, Hogan Lovells Worldwide Group (a Swiss Verein), and
their
affiliated businesses. Hogan Lovells International LLP is a limited liability
partnership
registered in England and Wales with registered number OC323639. Registered
office
and principal place of business: Atlantic House, Holborn Viaduct, London EC1A
2FG.
Hogan Lovells US LLP is a limited liability partnership registered in the
District of Columbia.
The word "partner" is used to refer to a member of Hogan Lovells International
LLP or a
partner of Hogan Lovells US LLP, or an employee or consultant with equivalent
standing and qualifications, and to a partner, member, employee or consultant
in any of
their affiliated businesses who has equivalent standing. A list of the members
of
Hogan Lovells International LLP and of the non-members who are designated as
partners,
and of their respective professional qualifications, is open to inspection at
the above address.
Further important information about Hogan Lovells can be found on
www.hoganlovells.com.
CONFIDENTIALITY. This email and any attachments are confidential, except where
the
email is marked "officiel", it may also be privileged. If received in error,
please do not
disclose the contents to anyone, but notify the sender by return email and
delete this email
(and any attachments) from your system.
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|