ICANN ICANN Email List Archives


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

[gnso-udrp-dt] RE: Update on the Singapore Meeting Session on the UDRP

  • To: "'Margie Milam'" <Margie.Milam@xxxxxxxxx>, "gnso-udrp-dt@xxxxxxxxx" <gnso-udrp-dt@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: [gnso-udrp-dt] RE: Update on the Singapore Meeting Session on the UDRP
  • From: "Rosette, Kristina" <krosette@xxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2011 18:56:10 -0400

I'm fine with this as long as we (a) restrict speakers to their reactions on 
the Staff recommendations in the Preliminary Issue Report; (b) only have one 
UDRP Panelist; (c) check with John and Ari as to whether either wants to 
participate; and (d) restrict the total time spent on staff recap and the panel 
is less than 1/2 of the total session time.

From: owner-gnso-udrp-dt@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-udrp-dt@xxxxxxxxx] On 
Behalf Of Margie Milam
Sent: Tuesday, June 07, 2011 5:34 PM
To: gnso-udrp-dt@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: [gnso-udrp-dt] Update on the Singapore Meeting Session on the UDRP

Dear All,
I just want to provide you with the feedback I received regarding the UDRP 
Session.   As discussed, I reached out to the Webinar panelists to see if they 
have an interest in participating in the Session.  The following have expressed 
an interest:

NAF- Kristine Dorrain
WIPO- David Turner Roche
CAC- Petr Hostas
Academic- Konstantinos Komaitis
Panelists-  David Bernstein and Neil Brown
Registrars-  Statton Hammock

Also, separately Susan Kawaguchi of Facebook expressed an interest in 
participating as a panelist.

I recommend that all of them participate, as this would be a good cross-section 
of perspectives.   I need let them know ASAP, so please respond by COB tomorrow 
if you object to this approach.


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy