<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[gnso-udrp-dt] RE: Update on the Singapore Meeting Session on the UDRP
- To: "'Margie Milam'" <Margie.Milam@xxxxxxxxx>, "gnso-udrp-dt@xxxxxxxxx" <gnso-udrp-dt@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [gnso-udrp-dt] RE: Update on the Singapore Meeting Session on the UDRP
- From: "Rosette, Kristina" <krosette@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2011 18:56:10 -0400
I'm fine with this as long as we (a) restrict speakers to their reactions on
the Staff recommendations in the Preliminary Issue Report; (b) only have one
UDRP Panelist; (c) check with John and Ari as to whether either wants to
participate; and (d) restrict the total time spent on staff recap and the panel
is less than 1/2 of the total session time.
________________________________
From: owner-gnso-udrp-dt@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-udrp-dt@xxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Margie Milam
Sent: Tuesday, June 07, 2011 5:34 PM
To: gnso-udrp-dt@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: [gnso-udrp-dt] Update on the Singapore Meeting Session on the UDRP
Dear All,
I just want to provide you with the feedback I received regarding the UDRP
Session. As discussed, I reached out to the Webinar panelists to see if they
have an interest in participating in the Session. The following have expressed
an interest:
NAF- Kristine Dorrain
WIPO- David Turner Roche
CAC- Petr Hostas
Academic- Konstantinos Komaitis
Panelists- David Bernstein and Neil Brown
Registrars- Statton Hammock
Also, separately Susan Kawaguchi of Facebook expressed an interest in
participating as a panelist.
I recommend that all of them participate, as this would be a good cross-section
of perspectives. I need let them know ASAP, so please respond by COB tomorrow
if you object to this approach.
Thanks,
Margie
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|