[gnso-udrp-dt] RE: Update on the Singapore Meeting Session on the UDRP

["Rosette, Kristina" <krosette@xxxxxxx>]

See Margie's May 31 recap email, which I've copied below:

The proposed format for the Singapore Session:


*         I will open the Session with an overview of the Preliminary Issue 
report that (published last week).  This overview will go over the Staff 
Recommendations, as well as the other parts of the Report, including the list 
of issues that is attached as an Annex to the Report.

*         I will provide a review of public comments filed to date, and any 
questions or comments submitted remotely prior to the Session.  It was felt 
that if these were read early in the session,  the panelists might be able to 
address them in their remarks.

*         The Webinar speakers will be contacted to see if they plan to be in 
attendance in Singapore, and if so, whether they would like an additional 
opportunity to comment.  Since some speakers may have felt that 5 minutes was 
not sufficient time to address their concerns, it was felt that they should be 
allocated additional time.

*         The panelists will be asked to comment specifically on (i) any of the 
public comments/session questions submitted, and (ii) the Staff recommendations 
in the Preliminary Issue Report, including

o   whether they agree with or have other suggested approaches for dealing with 
a review of the UDRP

o   whether  they have additions to the list of issues described in Annex 2

o   whether they would recharacterize any of the issues as "policy" or 
"process" issues

*         There should be sufficient time reserved for open mic to allow the 
public to participate



________________________________
From: owner-gnso-udrp-dt@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-udrp-dt@xxxxxxxxx] On 
Behalf Of Neuman, Jeff
Sent: Tuesday, June 07, 2011 6:01 PM
To: Margie Milam; gnso-udrp-dt@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: [gnso-udrp-dt] RE: Update on the Singapore Meeting Session on the UDRP

Just a question and it may be too late to ask, but why are we asking some of 
the same exact people to present that presented in the webinar?    It seems to 
me that hearing different perspectives may be helpful particularly in light of 
the recommendations of the staff report.

Jeffrey J. Neuman
Neustar, Inc. / Vice President, Law & Policy
Please note new address:  21575 Ridgetop Circle, Sterling VA 20166

________________________________
The information contained in this e-mail message is intended only for the use 
of the recipient(s) named above and may contain confidential and/or privileged 
information. If you are not the intended recipient you have received this 
e-mail message in error and any review, dissemination, distribution, or copying 
of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication 
in error, please notify us immediately and delete the original message.


From: owner-gnso-udrp-dt@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-udrp-dt@xxxxxxxxx] On 
Behalf Of Margie Milam
Sent: Tuesday, June 07, 2011 5:34 PM
To: gnso-udrp-dt@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: [gnso-udrp-dt] Update on the Singapore Meeting Session on the UDRP

Dear All,
I just want to provide you with the feedback I received regarding the UDRP 
Session.   As discussed, I reached out to the Webinar panelists to see if they 
have an interest in participating in the Session.  The following have expressed 
an interest:

NAF- Kristine Dorrain
WIPO- David Turner Roche
CAC- Petr Hostas
Academic- Konstantinos Komaitis
Panelists-  David Bernstein and Neil Brown
Registrars-  Statton Hammock

Also, separately Susan Kawaguchi of Facebook expressed an interest in 
participating as a panelist.

I recommend that all of them participate, as this would be a good cross-section 
of perspectives.   I need let them know ASAP, so please respond by COB tomorrow 
if you object to this approach.

Thanks,
Margie