Re: [gnso-udrp-dt] RE: Update on the Singapore Meeting Session on the UDRP

["Taylor, David" <David.Taylor@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

That is good.

D 
David Taylor 
Partner 
Hogan Lovells International LLP 
6 Avenue Kléber, 75116 Paris, France 
Tel:+33 (0) 1 53 67 47 47 
Fax:+33 (0) 1 53 67 47 48 
Email:drd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
www.hoganlovells.com
 

From: Rosette, Kristina [mailto:krosette@xxxxxxx] 
Sent: Wednesday, June 08, 2011 10:04 PM
To: 'Margie Milam' <Margie.Milam@xxxxxxxxx>; 'Mary.Wong@xxxxxxxxxxx' 
<Mary.Wong@xxxxxxxxxxx>; tim@xxxxxxxxxxx <tim@xxxxxxxxxxx>; 
'gnso-udrp-dt@xxxxxxxxx' <gnso-udrp-dt@xxxxxxxxx>; owner-gnso-udrp-dt@xxxxxxxxx 
<owner-gnso-udrp-dt@xxxxxxxxx>; Jeff Neuman <Jeff.Neuman@xxxxxxxxxx> 
Subject: RE: [gnso-udrp-dt] RE: Update on the Singapore Meeting Session on the 
UDRP 
 

super!


________________________________

        From: Margie Milam [mailto:Margie.Milam@xxxxxxxxx] 
        Sent: Wednesday, June 08, 2011 4:02 PM
        To: Rosette, Kristina; 'Mary.Wong@xxxxxxxxxxx'; tim@xxxxxxxxxxx; 
'gnso-udrp-dt@xxxxxxxxx'; owner-gnso-udrp-dt@xxxxxxxxx; Jeff Neuman
        Subject: RE: [gnso-udrp-dt] RE: Update on the Singapore Meeting Session 
on the UDRP
        
        

        Hi-  I just heard from John Berryhill that he would like to 
participate, so we’ll now have the respondent viewpoint addressed, assuming you 
all agree.

         

        Margie

         

        From: Margie Milam 
        Sent: Wednesday, June 08, 2011 11:26 AM
        To: 'Rosette, Kristina'; 'Mary.Wong@xxxxxxxxxxx'; tim@xxxxxxxxxxx; 
'gnso-udrp-dt@xxxxxxxxx'; owner-gnso-udrp-dt@xxxxxxxxx; Jeff Neuman
        Subject: RE: [gnso-udrp-dt] RE: Update on the Singapore Meeting Session 
on the UDRP

         

        Kristina,

        I reached out to all of the Webinar presenters and asked that they 
reply by COB yesterday.   I did not hear a response from either John or Ari.

         

        Margie

         

        From: Rosette, Kristina [mailto:krosette@xxxxxxx] 
        Sent: Wednesday, June 08, 2011 11:24 AM
        To: 'Mary.Wong@xxxxxxxxxxx'; tim@xxxxxxxxxxx; 'gnso-udrp-dt@xxxxxxxxx'; 
Margie Milam; owner-gnso-udrp-dt@xxxxxxxxx; Jeff Neuman
        Subject: RE: [gnso-udrp-dt] RE: Update on the Singapore Meeting Session 
on the UDRP

         

        No preference on moderator - although some in the GNSO/ICANN Community 
would perceive you to be from the free-speech-at-all-costs community :-)

         

        Margie - did you reach out to John and Ari about participating?  What 
did they say?  

         

        If Margie has reached out to them and they can't participate, I'm at a 
loss as to who else we could invite who can speak knowledgeably and with 
experience from the Respondent point of view.

         

        K

                 

                
________________________________


                From: Mary.Wong@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:Mary.Wong@xxxxxxxxxxx] 
                Sent: Wednesday, June 08, 2011 1:21 PM
                To: Rosette, Kristina; tim@xxxxxxxxxxx; 
'gnso-udrp-dt@xxxxxxxxx'; Margie Milam; owner-gnso-udrp-dt@xxxxxxxxx; Jeff 
Neuman
                Subject: Re: [gnso-udrp-dt] RE: Update on the Singapore Meeting 
Session on the UDRP

                Thanks for suggesting me, Tim - if the rest of the team thinks 
it may be better to have me (academic, GNSO Council) moderate instead of 
Jonathan (who may be perceived by some in the GNSO/ICANN community to be from 
the TM/rights-holder community), I'd be happy to do so. 

                 

                (but I won't take it personally if folks prefer to go with 
Jonathan :)

                 

                As for Susan Kawaguchi, since David Bernstein will not be in 
Singapore, would we want to consider her as a panelist? Or would that stir up 
the "we need more broadly representative Registrants" hornet's nest?

                 

                Cheers

                Mary

                 

                Mary W S Wong

                Professor of Law

                Chair, Graduate IP Programs

                Director, Franklin Pierce Center for IP

                UNIVERSITY OF NEW HAMPSHIRE SCHOOL OF LAW
                Two White Street
                Concord, NH 03301
                USA
                Email: mary.wong@xxxxxxxxxxx
                Phone: 1-603-513-5143
                Webpage: http://www.law.unh.edu/marywong/index.php
                Selected writings available on the Social Science Research 
Network (SSRN) at: http://ssrn.com/author=437584

                >>> 

From: 

<tim@xxxxxxxxxxx>

To:

"Margie Milam" <Margie.Milam@xxxxxxxxx>, <owner-gnso-udrp-dt@xxxxxxxxx>, 
"Neuman, Jeff" <Jeff.Neuman@xxxxxxxxxx>, "'krosette@xxxxxxx'" 
<krosette@xxxxxxx>, "'gnso-udrp-dt@xxxxxxxxx'" <gnso-udrp-dt@xxxxxxxxx>

Date: 

6/8/2011 10:29 AM

Subject: 

Re: [gnso-udrp-dt] RE: Update on the Singapore Meeting Session on the UDRP

Perhaps Mary would be willing to moderate?

________________________________

From: Margie Milam <Margie.Milam@xxxxxxxxx> 

Sender: owner-gnso-udrp-dt@xxxxxxxxx 

Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2011 07:20:52 -0700

To: Neuman, Jeff<Jeff.Neuman@xxxxxxxxxx>; 'krosette@xxxxxxx'<krosette@xxxxxxx>; 
'gnso-udrp-dt@xxxxxxxxx'<gnso-udrp-dt@xxxxxxxxx>

Subject: [gnso-udrp-dt] RE: Update on the Singapore Meeting Session on the UDRP

 

Hi-  I thought it would be better if I am not moderator for the same reason, so 
we should think about who might be  a good moderator for this session.  

 

On a separate note,  David Bernstein decided not to come to Singapore after all.

 

Margie

 

From: owner-gnso-udrp-dt@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-udrp-dt@xxxxxxxxx] On 
Behalf Of Neuman, Jeff
Sent: Tuesday, June 07, 2011 5:32 PM
To: 'krosette@xxxxxxx'; 'gnso-udrp-dt@xxxxxxxxx'
Subject: [gnso-udrp-dt] Re: Update on the Singapore Meeting Session on the UDRP

 

Thanks. 

FyI - I was kidding about me being the moderator thing. On the other hand, it 
may be better to have someone other than the author of the report serve as the 
moderator so that Margie could answer questions related to the Staff paper.



Jeffrey J. Neuman, Esq. 
Vice President, Law & Policy 
NeuStar, Inc. 
Jeff.Neuman@xxxxxxxxxxx 


 

From: Rosette, Kristina [mailto:krosette@xxxxxxx] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 07, 2011 06:53 PM
To: Neuman, Jeff; gnso-udrp-dt@xxxxxxxxx <gnso-udrp-dt@xxxxxxxxx> 
Subject: RE: Update on the Singapore Meeting Session on the UDRP 
 

We had planned for the panel portion to be less than 1/2 of the allotted time 
(according to my notes) and I would be A-OK with limiting the panelists to 
reacting to the Staff recommendations, namely:  (1) whether they agree with or 
have other suggested approaches for dealing with a review of the UDRP; (2)  
whether  they have additions to the list of issues described in Annex 2; (3)  
whether they would recharacterize any of the issues as “policy” or “process” 
issues.  Provided we stick to that limitation, I think it's valuable to get the 
input from these folks who were considered to have meaningful contributions 
before.   

 

Given the location and time difference issue, we'll need to include questions 
posted ahead by those who can't attend and can't participate remotely in real 
time.

 

If the persons who made those comments at the private registrar event on the 
UDRP want to rise them in the session, they will certainly be able to do so.  

 

As for moderator, I prefer that we stick with Margie.

 

         

        
________________________________


        From: owner-gnso-udrp-dt@xxxxxxxxx 
[mailto:owner-gnso-udrp-dt@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Neuman, Jeff
        Sent: Tuesday, June 07, 2011 6:09 PM
        To: Neuman, Jeff; Margie Milam; gnso-udrp-dt@xxxxxxxxx
        Subject: [gnso-udrp-dt] RE: Update on the Singapore Meeting Session on 
the UDRP

        I also think that we should not necessarily have a panel approach to 
the presentation.  I believe we should have the staff do a short presentation 
on the preliminary issues report and throw out questions to those in 
attendance.  For example, I heard some great views by people last week at a 
private registrar event on the UDRP, none of which were reflected by the last 
panel or in the staff paper.  For example, some of them were concerned that the 
registrars who liberally interpret the UDRP would not follow any type of 
voluntary best practices and would only benefit from consensus policies and 
strict enforcement of those policies.  That can only be done through a PDP.  
        
        On the other hand, if you do have a panel, I would love to moderate and 
ask the tough questions ;)

         

        Jeffrey J. Neuman 
        Neustar, Inc. / Vice President, Law & Policy
        Please note new address:  21575 Ridgetop Circle, Sterling VA 20166     

         

        
________________________________


        The information contained in this e-mail message is intended only for 
the use of the recipient(s) named above and may contain confidential and/or 
privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient you have received 
this e-mail message in error and any review, dissemination, distribution, or 
copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this 
communication in error, please notify us immediately and delete the original 
message.

         

         

        From: owner-gnso-udrp-dt@xxxxxxxxx 
[mailto:owner-gnso-udrp-dt@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Neuman, Jeff
        Sent: Tuesday, June 07, 2011 6:01 PM
        To: Margie Milam; gnso-udrp-dt@xxxxxxxxx
        Subject: [gnso-udrp-dt] RE: Update on the Singapore Meeting Session on 
the UDRP

         

        Just a question and it may be too late to ask, but why are we asking 
some of the same exact people to present that presented in the webinar?    It 
seems to me that hearing different perspectives may be helpful particularly in 
light of the recommendations of the staff report.

         

        Jeffrey J. Neuman 
        Neustar, Inc. / Vice President, Law & Policy
        Please note new address:  21575 Ridgetop Circle, Sterling VA 20166     

         

        
________________________________


        The information contained in this e-mail message is intended only for 
the use of the recipient(s) named above and may contain confidential and/or 
privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient you have received 
this e-mail message in error and any review, dissemination, distribution, or 
copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this 
communication in error, please notify us immediately and delete the original 
message.

         

         

        From: owner-gnso-udrp-dt@xxxxxxxxx 
[mailto:owner-gnso-udrp-dt@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Margie Milam
        Sent: Tuesday, June 07, 2011 5:34 PM
        To: gnso-udrp-dt@xxxxxxxxx
        Subject: [gnso-udrp-dt] Update on the Singapore Meeting Session on the 
UDRP

         

        Dear All,

        I just want to provide you with the feedback I received regarding the 
UDRP Session.   As discussed, I reached out to the Webinar panelists to see if 
they have an interest in participating in the Session.  The following have 
expressed an interest:

         

        NAF- Kristine Dorrain 

        WIPO- David Turner Roche 

        CAC- Petr Hostas

        Academic- Konstantinos Komaitis

        Panelists-  David Bernstein and Neil Brown

        Registrars-  Statton Hammock

         

        Also, separately Susan Kawaguchi of Facebook expressed an interest in 
participating as a panelist.

         

        I recommend that all of them participate, as this would be a good 
cross-section of perspectives.   I need let them know ASAP, so please respond 
by COB tomorrow if you object to this approach.

         

        Thanks,

        Margie

         

                 


________________________________________
Hogan Lovells (Paris) LLP is a limited liability partnership registered in 
England and Wales 
with registered number OC353350
Hogan Lovells refers to the international legal practice comprising Hogan 
Lovells International 
LLP, Hogan Lovells US LLP, Hogan Lovells Worldwide Group (a Swiss Verein), and 
their 
affiliated businesses.  Hogan Lovells International LLP is a limited liability 
partnership 
registered in England and Wales with registered number OC323639.  Registered 
office 
and principal place of business: Atlantic House, Holborn Viaduct, London EC1A 
2FG.  
Hogan Lovells US LLP is a limited liability partnership registered in the 
District of Columbia.
The word "partner" is used to refer to a member of Hogan Lovells International 
LLP or a 
partner of Hogan Lovells US LLP, or an employee or consultant with equivalent 
standing and qualifications, and to a partner, member, employee or consultant 
in any of 
their affiliated businesses who has equivalent standing.  A list of the members 
of 
Hogan Lovells International LLP and of the non-members who are designated as 
partners, 
and of their respective professional qualifications, is open to inspection at 
the above address. 
Further important information about Hogan Lovells can be found on 
www.hoganlovells.com.
CONFIDENTIALITY.  This email and any attachments are confidential, except where 
the 
email is marked "officiel", it  may also be privileged.  If received in error, 
please do not 
disclose the contents to anyone, but notify the sender by return email and 
delete this email 
(and any attachments) from your system.