ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[gnso-vi-feb10]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] a first idea to trash

  • To: Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx
  • Subject: Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] a first idea to trash
  • From: Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 2 Feb 2010 18:16:44 -0500

hi,

I asume the council has to review it and probably approve it, but i am not sure 
that doesn't mean we can't start the prep work.  I did suggest the council 
review as week 3,  which is when i think your next meeting is if this is week 
one.

The council voted for 16 weeks, which means start ASAP.  And the council set 
the topic so I am suggesting that collecting statements and comments and 
getting the staff started could be initiated out of the drafting team.  And of 
course going to the Council for an email review seems reasonable if for some 
reason we do not complete the charter in time for motion deadline - assuming 
this needs a motion instead of just a 'does anyone object and who shall we 
appoint as liaison' agenda item.

a.



On 2 Feb 2010, at 17:56, Gomes, Chuck wrote:

> Avri,
> 
> Are you assuming that the Council does not need to approve the charter
> as usually happens?  If not, are you assuming that the Council could
> approve it via email?
> 
> Chuck 
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx 
>> [mailto:owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Avri Doria
>> Sent: Tuesday, February 02, 2010 5:51 PM
>> To: Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx
>> Subject: [gnso-vi-feb10] a first idea to trash
>> 
>> 
>> Hi,
>> 
>> 
>> In order to kick off the debate on a charter, i offer the 
>> following as a first timetable as a conversation starter:
>> 
>> The Motion defined the task as:
>> 
>> - the PDP shall evaluate which policy recommendations, if 
>> any,  should be developed on the topic of vertical 
>> integration between registrars and registries affecting both 
>> new gTLDs and existing gTLDs, as may be possible under 
>> existing contracts and as allowed under the ICANN Bylaws;
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Week 1, 2  -  Council Drafting team will create a charter for 
>> the group 
>>                    -  Original recruitment for group members 
>> wil go out to the constituencies and the ICANN community. 
>>                    -  Staff begins documentation on existing 
>> approaches and practices, differentiating among Vertical 
>> Integration, Joint Marketing approaches
>>                        and cross-ownership, indicating 
>> differences of the effects on registrants and users of the approaches.
>> 
>> Week 3 - Council review charter and appoint council liaison.
>> 
>> week 4 - Group begins work.  
>>               (Collect Constituency statement and community 
>> comments weeks 2 - 5)
>> 
>> week 5, 6 - Review of existing documents and commentary. 
>>                  - Publish Staff document on existing 
>> approaches and practices
>> 
>> week 7 - 9 - Review staff document and constituency and 
>> public comments
>> 
>> week  9 - 11 - Discuss conditions under which various 
>> practices are appropriate
>> 
>> week 12 - 15 - Discuss and document policy recommendations
>> 
>> week 16 -  Send report to Council and out for public review.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 





<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy