Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] a first idea to trash

[Stéphane Van Gelder <stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx>]

My understanding is that the current group only works on the charter and that a 
new group is formed once the charter is approved. That new group is the WG.

If we blend these two steps into one, I expect you will find more people 
wanting to be on the charter drafting team, thereby overloading that team.

The two should be kept distinct in my opinion, with a validation by council 
step after the charter has been produced and then a call for WG participation.

Also, I would suggest you are starting this discussion a little early. We don't 
yet have every SG or constituency's rep on the charter DT and therefore the 
mailing list is limited to a few people at the moment.

Stéphane

Le 3 févr. 2010 à 00:16, Avri Doria a écrit :

> 
> hi,
> 
> I asume the council has to review it and probably approve it, but i am not 
> sure that doesn't mean we can't start the prep work.  I did suggest the 
> council review as week 3,  which is when i think your next meeting is if this 
> is week one.
> 
> The council voted for 16 weeks, which means start ASAP.  And the council set 
> the topic so I am suggesting that collecting statements and comments and 
> getting the staff started could be initiated out of the drafting team.  And 
> of course going to the Council for an email review seems reasonable if for 
> some reason we do not complete the charter in time for motion deadline - 
> assuming this needs a motion instead of just a 'does anyone object and who 
> shall we appoint as liaison' agenda item.
> 
> a.
> 
> 
> 
> On 2 Feb 2010, at 17:56, Gomes, Chuck wrote:
> 
>> Avri,
>> 
>> Are you assuming that the Council does not need to approve the charter
>> as usually happens?  If not, are you assuming that the Council could
>> approve it via email?
>> 
>> Chuck 
>> 
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx 
>>> [mailto:owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Avri Doria
>>> Sent: Tuesday, February 02, 2010 5:51 PM
>>> To: Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx
>>> Subject: [gnso-vi-feb10] a first idea to trash
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Hi,
>>> 
>>> 
>>> In order to kick off the debate on a charter, i offer the 
>>> following as a first timetable as a conversation starter:
>>> 
>>> The Motion defined the task as:
>>> 
>>> - the PDP shall evaluate which policy recommendations, if 
>>> any,  should be developed on the topic of vertical 
>>> integration between registrars and registries affecting both 
>>> new gTLDs and existing gTLDs, as may be possible under 
>>> existing contracts and as allowed under the ICANN Bylaws;
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Week 1, 2  -  Council Drafting team will create a charter for 
>>> the group 
>>>                   -  Original recruitment for group members 
>>> wil go out to the constituencies and the ICANN community. 
>>>                   -  Staff begins documentation on existing 
>>> approaches and practices, differentiating among Vertical 
>>> Integration, Joint Marketing approaches
>>>                       and cross-ownership, indicating 
>>> differences of the effects on registrants and users of the approaches.
>>> 
>>> Week 3 - Council review charter and appoint council liaison.
>>> 
>>> week 4 - Group begins work.  
>>>              (Collect Constituency statement and community 
>>> comments weeks 2 - 5)
>>> 
>>> week 5, 6 - Review of existing documents and commentary. 
>>>                 - Publish Staff document on existing 
>>> approaches and practices
>>> 
>>> week 7 - 9 - Review staff document and constituency and 
>>> public comments
>>> 
>>> week  9 - 11 - Discuss conditions under which various 
>>> practices are appropriate
>>> 
>>> week 12 - 15 - Discuss and document policy recommendations
>>> 
>>> week 16 -  Send report to Council and out for public review.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
> 
>