<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] Innovative Proposal
- To: Kathy Kleiman <kKleiman@xxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] Innovative Proposal
- From: Eric Brunner-Williams <ebw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2010 12:36:04 -0400
Kathy,
In the ... almost a year since PIR and Afilias and NeuStar put
together a proposal with a numeric target for community-based
registries to transition from one registrar regime to another, you
(plural) may have heard one or another of us from CORE observe that
the 15% cap, together with the number of applications transitioning to
operational status in the 2010+ round, provides a solution which does
not require a time or volume exception to Recommendation 19.
Could you explain why your scheme is better than our scheme?
Eric
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|