ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[gnso-vi-feb10]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] poll - Too early to ask these questions

  • To: <vgreimann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] poll - Too early to ask these questions
  • From: "Phil Buckingham" <pjbuckingham@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2010 17:54:39 +0100


Yep , I ll fifth this motion.  Please listen to / assess my proposal next
monday.
Jeff 's  paragraph ...."in addition"  ...... re vested interests ( dare I
say it ) is central to my proposal.
Central to all this is to get consensus ( what ever that means )
and " persuade /convince " the ICANN Board  ( at
Brussels - ha ha ) that VI Proposal X , Y  Z  is /are the "best" overall ,
in terms of cost and benefits to old registries , new registries , small
ones large ones , end users , registrars- everybody involved in the value chain.
One thing is certain is that the status quo /baseline ( default position)VI
cannot work / will not work in the new gTLD marketplace.
........ but there are some on here who disagree ... right ????
A secret poll perhaps - but in a couple of weeks time answering keys questions that Berry
& Jannik have raised  and I will also raise next week.

regards
Phil

----- Original Message ----- From: "Volker Greimann - Key-Systems GmbH" <vgreimann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, April 16, 2010 4:21 PM
Subject: Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] poll - Too early to ask these questions



Let me second (third?) this motion as well. I do think it will be
helpful to collect the opinions regarding the various proposals for an
early assessment of positions, but there still needs to be a lot of
discussion regarding the various positions before we can come to an
actual  vote.

I see a lot of merit in Janniks proposal. Like JC said: Less process
more substance!

Best regards,

Volker
I want to second Statton’s comment here. Having duly listened in on all
the calls and read (most) of the emails so far, I am nowhere near a
“black and white” view to be put on a poll. Additionaly, the
“signal/noise” ratio of the list has made things even harder at times.

Maybe we could devote most of Monday’s call to allow for some discussions
on the proposals themselves? Less process more substance!

Warm regards,
Jean-Christophe


Le 16/04/10 16:22, « Hammock, Statton » <shammock@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> a
écrit :

Mikey,

I will finally chime in here and support Jeff’s comment that it is a
little early to ask for our views on each of the proposals. I do like the
idea of the poll but I, personally, need a little more time to analyze
the details.  Some of the proposals were just introduced this week, after
all.

I have been mostly a “lurker” with respect to the e-mail exchanges on the
list but I have not been doing so with my hands “folded.”  I regularly
take notes on the points being raised by active members of the group and
try to map out where consensus might be found given the various
viewpoints.  Some of the discussions have struck me as being too
theoretical but also practical suggestions and proposals have been
introduced and I am trying to focus on them and really try to get a feel
on how this should play out.  Waiting another week for the poll would be
helpful to me.

Thanks,
Statton


Statton Hammock
Sr. Director, Law, Policy & Business Affairs

  [cid:3354281240_67265433]     P 703-668-5515  M 703-624-5031
<http://www.networksolutions.com> www.networksolutions.com
<http://www.networksolutions.com>




________________________________

From: owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Neuman, Jeff
Sent: Friday, April 16, 2010 10:01 AM
To: gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: [gnso-vi-feb10] poll - Too early to ask these questions

Mikey,

Although I appreciate the notion of taking polls, I just have the feeling
that it is WAY too early to ask the questions that you have on Poll #1.
Very few of us understand the implications of each of the proposals
enough to be able to comment on whether we support or oppose a particular
proposal much less whether we can fill in the comment sections on any
revisions that we would propose to that particular proposal.  I thought
we were going to form sub-teams to look at the proposals to discuss the
pros and cons of each of the proposals in order to potentially come up
with some sort of hybrid or consensus driven proposal (if possible).

In addition, there is nothing in the survey that asks the responder to
declare its interests (namely, (a) to check all that apply….gTLD
Registry, gTLD Registrar, New TLD Applicant, New TLD back-end Registry
Services Provider, etc., and (b) are you in favor of integration or
separation….).  I just think that coming out of this survey saying x
number of people support this proposal without the essential context is
going to be misleading especially with this group being so stacked with
New TLD applicants, registries, registry services providers and
registrars).

I would strongly ask that we withdraw this survey for this week in favor
of proceeding as initially proposed.

Best regards,

Jeffrey J. Neuman
Neustar, Inc. / Vice President, Law & Policy
46000 Center Oak Plaza Sterling, VA 20166
Office: +1.571.434.5772 Mobile: +1.202.549.5079 Fax: +1.703.738.7965 /
jeff.neuman@xxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:jeff.neuman@xxxxxxxxxxx>   /
www.neustar.biz <http://www.neustar.biz/>


________________________________
The information contained in this e-mail message is intended only for the
use of the recipient(s) named above and may contain confidential and/or
privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient you have
received this e-mail message in error and any review, dissemination,
distribution, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you
have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately
and delete the original message.



______________________
Jean-Christophe Vignes

Executive Vice-President & General Counsel
DCL Group
2, rue Léon Laval
L-3372 Leudelange

Tel.:  +352  20 200 123
Mobile : +352 691 600 424
Fax.:   +352 20 300 123
Mailto: JCVignes@xxxxxxxxxxx

www.datacenter.eu   | www.eurodns.com   | www.voipgate.com

________________________________
--------------------------------------------------------

This e-mail and any attached files are confidential and intended solely
for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If
you have received this e-mail by mistake, please notify the sender
immediately and delete it from your system. You must not copy the message
or disclose its contents to anyone.

Think of the environment: don't print this e-mail unless you really need
to.

--------------------------------------------------------




--
Bei weiteren Fragen stehen wir Ihnen gerne zur Verfügung.

Mit freundlichen Grüßen,

Volker A. Greimann
- Rechtsabteilung -

Key-Systems GmbH
Prager Ring 4-12
66482 Zweibrücken
Tel.: +49 (0) 6332 - 79 18 85
Fax.: +49 (0) 6332 - 79 18 61
Email: vgreimann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Web: www.key-systems.net / www.RRPproxy.net
www.domaindiscount24.com / www.BrandShelter.com

Folgen Sie uns bei Twitter oder werden Sie unser Fan bei Facebook:
www.key-systems.net/facebook
www.twitter.com/key_systems

Geschäftsführer: Alexander Siffrin
Handelsregister Nr.: HR B 1861 - Zweibruecken
Umsatzsteuer ID.: DE211006534

Der Inhalt dieser Nachricht ist vertraulich und nur für den angegebenen
Empfänger bestimmt. Jede Form der Kenntnisgabe, Veröffentlichung oder
Weitergabe an Dritte durch den Empfänger ist unzulässig. Sollte diese
Nachricht nicht für Sie bestimmt sein, so bitten wir Sie, sich mit uns per
E-Mail oder telefonisch in Verbindung zu setzen.

--------------------------------------------

Should you have any further questions, please do not hesitate to contact
us.

Best regards,

Volker A. Greimann
- legal department -

Key-Systems GmbH
Prager Ring 4-12
DE-66482 Zweibruecken
Tel.: +49 (0) 6332 - 79 18 85
Fax.: +49 (0) 6332 - 79 18 61
Email: vgreimann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Web: www.key-systems.net / www.RRPproxy.net
www.domaindiscount24.com / www.BrandShelter.com

Follow us on Twitter or join our fan community on Facebook and stay
updated:
www.key-systems.net/facebook
www.twitter.com/key_systems

CEO: Alexander Siffrin
Registration No.: HR B 1861 - Zweibruecken
V.A.T. ID.: DE211006534

This e-mail and its attachments is intended only for the person to whom it
is addressed. Furthermore it is not permitted to publish any content of
this email. You must not use, disclose, copy, print or rely on this
e-mail. If an addressing or transmission error has misdirected this
e-mail, kindly notify the author by replying to this e-mail or contacting
us by telephone.










<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy