<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] poll - Too early to ask these questions
- To: Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] poll - Too early to ask these questions
- From: berrycobb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2010 17:32:09 -0400
RT & Team,
My bad..... Structural/Functional Separation. I made my error in
"SprintSpeed" from my BB.
Because of my error, this is yet another reason that I request we
build a definition list.
Berry Cobb
Infinity Portals LLC
berrycobb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.infinityportals.com
866.921.8891
Richard Tindal wrote:-----------------------
Berry,
What do you mean by strict separation?
Does it mean not just corporate separation but also financial and
operational separation - along the lines PIR has proposed?
RT
On Apr 16, 2010, at 8:42 AM, Berry Cobb wrote:
VI Team,
I agree with polling, but I also believe the type of poll questions
are premature. Instead, we should be asking more general questions.
For example,
1. Do you agree with the boards latest position of 0CO and strict
separation?
2. Do you prefer to maintain 0CO and strict separation going forward?
3. Do you agree with partial cross ownership and strict separation
for new gTLDs? Existing TLDs?
4. Do agree with full cross ownership and relaxing strict separation?
5. Do you agree that changes should be made to accommodate SR?
6. Etc...... I am sure there are many more general questions.
I do believe this type of temperature gauging across the group will
be useful. I also agree that the poll should indicate the poll
taker's affiliation per Jeff Neuman's comment below.
Thoughts?
Thank you
Berry Cobb
Infinity Portals LLC
866.921.8891
Sent from my BlackBerry® smartphone with SprintSpeed
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|