<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[gnso-vi-feb10]
- To: "'Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx'" <Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [gnso-vi-feb10]
- From: Jeff Eckhaus <eckhaus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2010 14:29:16 -0700
Brian,
Thanks for the submission of your proposal and for keeping it short and simple.
I am still reading through it and the implications.
I do have one question on the proposal that hopefully you can answer.
You state that the 15% ownership cap avoids creating ownership positions to
discriminate against unaffiliated registrars. If a Registry did not act as a
Registrar in the TLD that it owned or provided back end services for, so there
was actually no affiliated registrar, wouldn't that accomplish the same goal ?
Would we still need a 15% cap ?
Thanks
Jeff Eckhaus
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|