<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[gnso-vi-feb10] RE: Is this is similar issue
- To: Jeff Eckhaus <eckhaus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx" <Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [gnso-vi-feb10] RE: Is this is similar issue
- From: Milton L Mueller <mueller@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 24 Apr 2010 16:32:54 -0400
Sorry to respond slowly to this. I see that no one else has responded, but I
think it's an important post.
Every industry has its unique characteristics, but most of the issues we are
dealing with here are played out in other industries and the basic competition
policy issues are quite similar, and so are the politics.
The wine industry is very similar structurally to what is being discussed here.
A certain structural model was imposed on the industry years ago for reasons
that are completely irrelevant now. In the case of wine, it was prohibition,
and the feeling (after its repeal) that distribution of alcoholic beverages had
to be strictly controlled under highly regulated auspices in order to assuage
the temperance constituency. Decades later, that structure created a special
interest groups that were able to maintain the system long after the rationale
for its original creation was gone.
The key lesson for consumers is that direct distribution by a supplier
increases the chances of smaller wineries (or TLDs) being able to survive in
the market place. Almost all of the economists who have analyzed the wine
situation agree that the restrictions stay in place _only_ for political
economy reasons; i.e., the lobbying and benefits retained by incumbent
wholesalers.
From: owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Jeff Eckhaus
Sent: Tuesday, April 20, 2010 5:37 PM
To: Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: [gnso-vi-feb10] Is this is similar issue
I just read this article about the legislation to stop wineries and breweries
from shipping direct to consumers and it felt like déjà vu.
http://www.winespectator.com/webfeature/show?id=42526
Some of the lines from this article may have been lifted from this mailing
list. Wholesalers state they are only working in the public interest and that
they are only trying to protect consumers and that is why we must maintain the
current three tier system.
The other side who want to deal directly with consumers are claiming that
wholesalers are only using scare tactics to preserve their long standing
monopolies.
I think this quote from US Congressman Mike Thompson may have been lifted from
one of our transcripts "For decades, wholesalers have expended great resources
to protect their state-mandated distribution system in ways that have harmed
wineries and breweries. These efforts have stunted competition and weakened
producers, which ultimately leads to fewer choices for consumers,"
I know we need to keep this mailing list on topic but reading this discussion
on shipping wine seemed identical to the issues this group is facing and
thought it would be worth sharing
Jeff Eckhaus
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|