<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [gnso-vi-feb10] Go Daddy position and proposal
- To: Tim Ruiz <tim@xxxxxxxxxxx>, "gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx" <gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [gnso-vi-feb10] Go Daddy position and proposal
- From: Milton L Mueller <mueller@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2010 09:29:14 -0400
Thanks, Tim, for your proposal.
After reading it I assume that your use of the term "VI" really means both
Vertical Integration and Cross Ownership.
Is there any difference in your perspectives on VI and CO?
--MM
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-vi-
> feb10@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Tim Ruiz
> Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 10:41 PM
> To: gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [gnso-vi-feb10] Go Daddy position and proposal
>
> I apologize for the late posting of our proposal, attached. We had not
> intended to submit one when this WG began, but after consideration of
> the other proposals it became clear that none really addressed the
> concerns we have and that it would be best to submit our own.
>
> I'll be available to discuss or answer questions on tomorrow's call.
>
>
> Tim
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|