<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] Orphans, existance and exploitation of
- To: "'ebw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx'" <ebw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "'kKleiman@xxxxxxx'" <kKleiman@xxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] Orphans, existance and exploitation of
- From: Jeff Eckhaus <eckhaus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 1 May 2010 11:39:51 -0700
Eric - good point and maybe now is the time to bring up there are 900+
registrar credentials out there.
----- Original Message -----
From: owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx <owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx>
To: Kathy Kleiman <kKleiman@xxxxxxx>
Cc: Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx <Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Sat May 01 04:51:15 2010
Subject: [gnso-vi-feb10] Orphans, existance and exploitation of
Kathy,
Am I correct in understanding the "orphan" status?
Suppose Registrar X has a standing offer to every new gTLD registry
applicant. For those applicants which garner no other offer, X is
guaranteed 50,000 transactions at a margin it sets.
X could set the price at 10x the registry price, prompting the
registry to pay greenmail to get "orphan" status, and sell its
inventory at the registry price, or fail.
If the first 50k names are going to be generics and trademarks and so
on, at sunrise and land rush pricing, will any applicant obtain
"orphan" status before that inventory is exhausted?
Thanks in advance,
Eric
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|