RE: [gnso-vi-feb10] OUR WG TABLE - For Final Inputs!

["Kathy Kleiman" <kKleiman@xxxxxxx>]

AZ Tim!

Kathy Kleiman
Director of Policy
.ORG The Public Interest Registry
Direct: +1 703 889-5756  Mobile: +1 703 371-6846

Visit us online!
Check out events & blogs at .ORG Buzz!
Find us on Facebook | dotorg
See the .ORG Buzz! Photo Gallery on Flickr
See our video library on YouTube

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTE:
Proprietary and confidential to .ORG, The Public Interest Registry.  If 
received in error, please inform sender and then delete.




-----Original Message-----
From: Tim Ruiz [mailto:tim@xxxxxxxxxxx] 
Sent: Friday, May 14, 2010 5:40 PM
To: Kathy Kleiman
Cc: Jeff Eckhaus; Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [gnso-vi-feb10] OUR WG TABLE - For Final Inputs!

Why is Kathy giving us all Texas knicknames - Texas Tim, Texas Eric,
Texas Jeff? 

Wait, what....? Oh, ok.

Never mind.


Tim 
 
 
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: RE: [gnso-vi-feb10] OUR WG TABLE - For Final Inputs!
From: "Kathy Kleiman" <kKleiman@xxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, May 14, 2010 4:17 pm
To: "Jeff Eckhaus" <eckhaus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx>


Tx Jeff!

Kathy Kleiman
Director of Policy
.ORG The Public Interest Registry
Direct: +1 703 889-5756  Mobile: +1 703 371-6846

Visit us online!
Check out events & blogs at .ORG Buzz!
Find us on Facebook | dotorg
See the .ORG Buzz! Photo Gallery on Flickr
See our video library on YouTube

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTE:
Proprietary and confidential to .ORG, The Public Interest Registry.  If
received in error, please inform sender and then delete.




-----Original Message-----
From: owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Jeff Eckhaus
Sent: Friday, May 14, 2010 4:57 PM
To: Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [gnso-vi-feb10] OUR WG TABLE - For Final Inputs!


All,

I have attempted to update the spreadsheet with the points from the
original DM proposal, but wanted to add that this was a proposal, not
the current standing on all points and issues. I think this is an
important point people need to understand. The original idea was to put
together the proposals in a spreadsheet, not what everyone's current
outlook is and what they would agree to.


I also wanted to point out that the cell that asked for the "emphasis"
point was something that we did not specifically propose but feel needs
to be emphasized since it is a critical factor in open competition in
the TLD space.
I will use the words from the JN2 proposal since it captures the idea
best "Registry Operator or its Affiliate can co-own an ICANN-Accredited
Registrar in a TLD other than the TLD for which Registry Operator or its
Affiliate serves as the Registry"


Jeff Eckhaus




-----Original Message-----
From: owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Tim Ruiz
Sent: Friday, May 14, 2010 9:31 AM
To: Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [gnso-vi-feb10] OUR WG TABLE - For Final Inputs!

Attached is updated for Go Daddy's proposal.

Tim 

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: RE: [gnso-vi-feb10] OUR WG TABLE - For Final Inputs!
From: berrycobb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Fri, May 14, 2010 9:26 am
To: Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx


VIWG,

I took the liberty to make some formatting and spell check changes to
the matrix. Hopefully this will make it a bit easier to read.

Thanks.

Berry Cobb
Infinity Portals LLC
berrycobb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.infinityportals.com
866.921.8891



From: owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Kathy Kleiman
Sent: Friday, May 14, 2010 6:13 AM
To: Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: [gnso-vi-feb10] OUR WG TABLE - For Final Inputs!

All,
This is it, the moment you have been waiting for - the New VI WG Table.

It needs your help! I reviewed and revised a few table categories with
those who had suggestions on our last call (special tx to Jon N).
Now, it is your turn. If you/your company/your constituency submitted a
proposal, **please review the table and update it with your ideas, your
conclusions, your words.** Updates should go to the whole group, or to
me and Mikey (both,
please) by ** Sunday morning**.

There are new categories for clearer understanding of Equal Access and
Ry/Rr structure proposed in the exceptions.
Added/Revised:
Column G: Ry must accept (1) all IA Rrs (gTLD model) OR (2) may select
among IA Rrs based on special, objective criteria (sponsored TLD model)
Column H: Non-Discrimination Among Rrs (Technology, Customer Support,
Etc)
Column L: Under threshold: (1) Ry may distribute directly (subject to
RAA-type obligations) OR (2) Ry may co-own a Rr > 15% to distribute TLD
Column M: Equal Access Required Below Threshold?

Otherwise, it?s the same. Tx for filling it in (you don?t want to rely
on me ? I wrote one of the proposals!) Best,

Kathy Kleiman
Director of Policy

.ORG The Public Interest Registry
1775 Wiehle Avenue, Suite 200
Reston, Virginia 20190 USA

Main: +1 703 889-5778 | Direct: +1 703 889-5756
Mobile: +1 703 371-6846 | Fax: +1 703.889.5779
E: kkleiman@xxxxxxx | W: www.pir.org

Visit us online!
Check out events & blogs at .ORG Buzz!
Find us on Facebook | dotorg
See the .ORG Buzz! Photo Gallery on Flickr See our video library on
YouTube

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTE:
Proprietary and confidential to .ORG, The Public Interest Registry. 
If received in error, please inform sender and then delete.