<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] Neustar Concerns with Afilias Proposals
- To: "Neuman, Jeff" <Jeff.Neuman@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] Neustar Concerns with Afilias Proposals
- From: "Michele Neylon :: Blacknight" <michele@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 7 Jun 2010 13:12:26 +0000
I'd be very supportive of Jeff's points
Others have spoken in support of his points much more eloquently than I could
manage, so I won't labour the point
On 4 Jun 2010, at 19:01, Neuman, Jeff wrote:
> All,
>
> I just wanted to go on the record with Neustar’s concerns over a strict
> interpretation of the “Afilias/PIR/Go-Daddy/Some ALAC members” proposal. As
> you know from the beginning, Neustar has opposed the complete vertical
> integration of registries and registrars because of all of the harms to
> registrants that have been previously expressed in letters we have helped
> co-author as well as the damaging effect on ensuring a level-competitive
> playing field amongst registries, registrars, back-end operators, etc.
> However, our concerns have been confined to the vertical
> integration/cross-ownership within a TLD as opposed to a general notion of
> cross ownership. What I mean is that we have never supported the notion that
> a registry or back-end registry operator could not distribute domain names in
> a TLD for which it was not the registry or back-end operator. This is not
> necessarily because Neustar wants to be a registrar, reseller or distributor
> for .com, .net or any new TLDs, but rather that we do not see any
> justification or any potential harms that would occur cross TLDs. In fact,
> we believe that Afilias’ proposal would have the effect of preventing any
> existing registrar or reseller from becoming a registry or back-end operator
> in any TLD even if they agree not to distribute names in that TLD.
>
> To us, that is by definition anti-competitive and would unnecessarily
> restrict new entrants into the registry/back-end registry service provider
> market without any justification. Similarly, it would restrict new entrants
> into the registrar market as well simply because they serve as a registry in
> a separate TLD. Preventing a Demand Media, Network Solutions, GoDaddy,
> Tucows, GMO or any registrar from being in the registry business completely
> is not what Neustar had in mind and is not something we can or should get
> behind. Similarly, preventing an existing or future registry/registry
> service provider from becoming a registrar or reseller in other TLDs is not
> what we have advocated.
>
> To summarize, I do believe strongly in strict limits to vertical integration
> and cross ownership within a TLD and believe that without such limits and
> protections, consumers and registrants will be harmed. I know there are
> others that dispute that and that is something we will work in the long term.
> But we have not seen any evidence of potential harms cross TLDs nor have we
> heard a justification for it. I prefer the JN2 Proposal because it
> contemplates this scenario. The only way we could support another proposal
> like the Afilias one, is to address the cross TLD issue.
>
> P.S. – we know the ICANN proposal is similar to the Afilias one in this
> respect and therefore will probably be making the same comments to the DAG.
>
> Jeffrey J. Neuman
> Neustar, Inc. / Vice President, Law & Policy
> 46000 Center Oak Plaza Sterling, VA 20166
> Office: +1.571.434.5772 Mobile: +1.202.549.5079 Fax: +1.703.738.7965 /
> jeff.neuman@xxxxxxxxxxx / www.neustar.biz
> The information contained in this e-mail message is intended only for the use
> of the recipient(s) named above and may contain confidential and/or
> privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient you have
> received this e-mail message in error and any review, dissemination,
> distribution, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have
> received this communication in error, please notify us immediately and delete
> the original message.
>
Mr Michele Neylon
Blacknight Solutions
Hosting & Colocation, Brand Protection
ICANN Accredited Registrar
http://www.blacknight.com/
http://blog.blacknight.com/
http://blacknight.mobi/
http://mneylon.tel
Intl. +353 (0) 59 9183072
US: 213-233-1612
UK: 0844 484 9361
Direct Dial: +353 (0)59 9183090
Fax. +353 (0) 1 4811 763
-------------------------------
Blacknight Internet Solutions Ltd, Unit 12A,Barrowside Business Park,Sleaty
Road,Graiguecullen,Carlow,Ireland Company No.: 370845
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|