Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] Single Registrant TLDs in VIWG Brussels report

[frederick felman <ffelman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Yes, agreed. +1

On 6/7/10 7:20 AM, "jarkko.ruuska@xxxxxxxxx" <jarkko.ruuska@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

> Dear all,
>  
> It is my observation that recently we haven¹t really spent much time on the
> Single Registrant TLDs. However, according to previous discussion (and also
> according to the newest proposal matrix)  it is evident that Single Registrant
> TLDs could be vertically integrated and should not need to use registrars. The
> exact conditions to that need a bit of fine-tuning but are essentially
> available in the current proposals.
>  
> My understanding is that this is something almost everyone agrees on and
> should therefore be noted in our Brussels report. I would even go a step
> further and suggest that this is something we have a consensus on and it
> should be part of our recommendation to be included in the final Applicant
> Guidebook. 
>  
> I also want to point out that Single Registrant TLDs should be noted as an
> exception regardless whether we reach a consensus about the cross-ownership in
> general.
>  
> Thanks,
>  
> -jr
>  
> JARKKO RUUSKA
> Head of Internet Domain Initiatives
> Compatibility and Industry Collaboration,  Tampere, Finland
> Nokia Corporation
> Tel: +358 50 324 7507
> E-Mail: jarkko.ruuska@xxxxxxxxx <jarkko.ruuska@xxxxxxxxx>
> 
> 
>  
>