RE: [gnso-vi-feb10] for the call today -- List of Harms

[Jeff Eckhaus <eckhaus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi Mikey,

On the call today could we discuss the harms list and the next steps towards 
differentiating the potential harms based on cross-ownership or not and maybe 
at different levels.  Some of the potential or claimed harms that are on the 
list have nothing to do with cross-ownership. For example it states Domain 
Registration abuse as a harm from cross-ownership. To me this is the equivalent 
of stating spam will happen due to cross-ownership, it exists now and is a 
harm, but has nothing to do with cross-ownership.

Some are  more dislikes in the current system. For example one of the harms 
listed is withhold high value names. This has nothing to do with cross 
ownership and it exists now in our system as many of the existing Registries 
have applied via RSEP to auction off the high value names that they held back. 

I know we are still working towards it, and would like to prioritize this piece 
if possible


Thanks


Jeff Eckhaus



-----Original Message-----
From: owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx] On 
Behalf Of Mike O'Connor
Sent: Monday, June 07, 2010 9:21 AM
To: Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: [gnso-vi-feb10] for the call today -- List of Harms

this is also a repeat of the document i sent earlier.  i'm just sending these 
again so they come quickly to hand for you