<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [gnso-vi-feb10] agenda for today's call
- To: Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg@xxxxxxxxx>, "Mike O'Connor" <mike@xxxxxxxxxx>, "Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx" <Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [gnso-vi-feb10] agenda for today's call
- From: "Neuman, Jeff" <Jeff.Neuman@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 7 Jun 2010 13:12:44 -0400
Alan,
If the Afilias proposal is adopted, then there is no reason for 15% and should
rather should be 5% (since that is the minimum that is required to be disclosed
under US Corporate law).
I don't think the Afilias proposal should be adopted, but if it were, it should
be 5% and not 15%.
Jeffrey J. Neuman
Neustar, Inc. / Vice President, Law & Policy
The information contained in this e-mail message is intended only for the use
of the recipient(s) named above and may contain confidential and/or privileged
information. If you are not the intended recipient you have received this
e-mail message in error and any review, dissemination, distribution, or copying
of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication
in error, please notify us immediately and delete the original message.
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Alan Greenberg
Sent: Monday, June 07, 2010 12:59 PM
To: Mike O'Connor; Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] agenda for today's call
I wonder if there is one other thing we can consider giving the time
left before Brussels?
Although the "mosaic" argument has been made regarding separating
issues (and I have used it myself on several occasions), perhaps
there is one important exception.
According to the table, the IPC proposal is the only one supporting
0% (or perhaps the 2% Board option). All others are at least 15%. Is
it possible that we can come to closure on this one point -
specifically to raise the zero/2% to 15%? It does not preclude
anything else as far as I read the proposals.
Alan
At 07/06/2010 12:19 PM, Mike O'Connor wrote:
>hi all,
>
>a pretty simple agenda -- more of a conversation-starter than anything else.
>
>-- Review agenda -- 5 minutes
>-- Roll call
>-- review the updated proposal-comparison table -- 20 minutes
>-- review the early-draft list of Harms -- 20 minutes
>-- review the draft list of Definitions -- 20 minutes
>-- other business -- 20 minutes
>
>i'll send copies of the three documents to the list as separate
>emails in a second.
>
>mikey
>
>
>- - - - - - - - -
>phone 651-647-6109
>fax 866-280-2356
>web www.haven2.com
>handle OConnorStP (ID for public places like Twitter, Facebook, Google, etc.)
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|