ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[gnso-vi-feb10]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [gnso-vi-feb10] agenda for today's call

  • To: Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg@xxxxxxxxx>, "Mike O'Connor" <mike@xxxxxxxxxx>, "Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx" <Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: RE: [gnso-vi-feb10] agenda for today's call
  • From: "Neuman, Jeff" <Jeff.Neuman@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 7 Jun 2010 13:12:44 -0400

Alan,

If the Afilias proposal is adopted, then there is no reason for 15% and should 
rather should be 5% (since that is the minimum that is required to be disclosed 
under US Corporate law).

I don't think the Afilias proposal should be adopted, but if it were, it should 
be 5% and not 15%.

Jeffrey J. Neuman 
Neustar, Inc. / Vice President, Law & Policy


The information contained in this e-mail message is intended only for the use 
of the recipient(s) named above and may contain confidential and/or privileged 
information. If you are not the intended recipient you have received this 
e-mail message in error and any review, dissemination, distribution, or copying 
of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication 
in error, please notify us immediately and delete the original message.


-----Original Message-----
From: owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx] On 
Behalf Of Alan Greenberg
Sent: Monday, June 07, 2010 12:59 PM
To: Mike O'Connor; Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] agenda for today's call


I wonder if there is one other thing we can consider giving the time 
left before Brussels?

Although the "mosaic" argument has been made regarding separating 
issues (and I have used it myself on several occasions), perhaps 
there is one important exception.

According to the table, the IPC proposal is the only one supporting 
0% (or perhaps the 2% Board option). All others are at least 15%. Is 
it possible that we can come to closure on this one point - 
specifically to raise the zero/2% to 15%? It does not preclude 
anything else as far as I read the proposals.

Alan

At 07/06/2010 12:19 PM, Mike O'Connor wrote:

>hi all,
>
>a pretty simple agenda -- more of a conversation-starter than anything else.
>
>-- Review agenda -- 5 minutes
>-- Roll call
>-- review the updated proposal-comparison table -- 20 minutes
>-- review the early-draft list of Harms -- 20 minutes
>-- review the draft list of Definitions -- 20 minutes
>-- other business -- 20 minutes
>
>i'll send copies of the three documents to the list as separate 
>emails in a second.
>
>mikey
>
>
>- - - - - - - - -
>phone   651-647-6109
>fax             866-280-2356
>web     www.haven2.com
>handle  OConnorStP (ID for public places like Twitter, Facebook, Google, etc.)





<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy