Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] RE: Point of order

[Stéphane Van Gelder <stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx>]

Oh, OK, you're talking about teleconference meetings only. I thought you were 
referring to on-list discussions.

Sorry for misunderstanding that.

Stéphane

Le 10 juin 2010 à 12:53, Ron Andruff a écrit :

> 
> With respect, Stephane, that is why we do a roll call . But more importantly, 
> no one should be making statements about another's position - particularly 
> when the one spoken about cannot respond.  I'm simply asking for appropriate 
> decorum. Nothing more. 
> 
> Kind regards, 
> 
> RA 
> 
> ------Original Message------
> From: Stéphane Van Gelder
> To: Ron Andruff
> Cc: gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx
> Sent: Jun 10, 2010 04:59
> Subject: Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] RE: Point of order
> 
>> Going forward, I ask that the Co-chairs please be sure that no one speaks
>> about another WG member's comments or makes comments about another member's
>> position when that individual cannot respond. 
> 
> Ron, Sorry to stick my oar in but that's a rather tall order for the 
> co-chairs isn't it? How can they know when someone's available to respond or 
> not? The only way I see to achieve what you seem to be asking is to stifle 
> every conversation...
> 
> Stéphane
> 
> ________________________________________
> Ron Andruff
> RNA Partners, Inc.
> randruff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> www.rnapartners.com
>