Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] RE: Point of order
- To: randruff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] RE: Point of order
- From: Stéphane Van Gelder <stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2010 14:41:41 +0200
Oh, OK, you're talking about teleconference meetings only. I thought you were
referring to on-list discussions.
Sorry for misunderstanding that.
Le 10 juin 2010 à 12:53, Ron Andruff a écrit :
> With respect, Stephane, that is why we do a roll call . But more importantly,
> no one should be making statements about another's position - particularly
> when the one spoken about cannot respond. I'm simply asking for appropriate
> decorum. Nothing more.
> Kind regards,
> ------Original Message------
> From: Stéphane Van Gelder
> To: Ron Andruff
> Cc: gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx
> Sent: Jun 10, 2010 04:59
> Subject: Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] RE: Point of order
>> Going forward, I ask that the Co-chairs please be sure that no one speaks
>> about another WG member's comments or makes comments about another member's
>> position when that individual cannot respond.
> Ron, Sorry to stick my oar in but that's a rather tall order for the
> co-chairs isn't it? How can they know when someone's available to respond or
> not? The only way I see to achieve what you seem to be asking is to stifle
> every conversation...
> Ron Andruff
> RNA Partners, Inc.