Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] Poll -- NEW ONE -- looking at "atoms" this time
Mikey, according to how I read your words, if one answers Green to (for instance) "Require use of ICANN-accredited Rr's", then you are willing to compromise and NOT require use of Registrars, and if you answer Red, you are insisting that Registrars MUST be used. This seems counter-intuitive. Or did I mis-interpret your intent? Alan At 14/06/2010 10:57 AM, Mike O'Connor wrote: hi all,i've put together another poll for you. this one "inverts" Kathy's matrix -- so instead of stating your views about the proposals, this one asks you to state your views about the headings in the table -- the "atoms."i've stolen Avri's idea for the definitions of the choices; Green - definitely willing to compromise Yellow - maybe some compromise is possible Red - dead set viewpoint - deviation is a deal breaker here's the link to the poll. <http://www.doodle.com/6vz2spk4a6t5m2cu>http://www.doodle.com/6vz2spk4a6t5m2cui've tightened up the security a little bit this time through -- i'm the only person who can delete/modify entries this time. we'll see how that goes.thanks! mikey - - - - - - - - - phone 651-647-6109 fax 866-280-2356 web <http://www.haven2.com>www.haven2.com handleOConnorStP (ID for public places like Twitter, Facebook, Google, etc.)
|