RE: [gnso-vi-feb10] telling the story of VI to the community

["Kathy Kleiman" <kKleiman@xxxxxxx>]

Hi Mikey,
Sorry if I missed it below, but I would include the Table as a major milestone 
of the group so far. It is the summary/group compilation/living document of our 
work on proposals and our evaluation and agreement of elements.

If you could include the table in your slides, or a portion, with a link to the 
full table, I think that would be very helpful for those viewing the slides.

Best and tx,

Kathy Kleiman
Director of Policy
.ORG The Public Interest Registry
Direct: +1 703 889-5756  Mobile: +1 703 371-6846

Visit us online!
Check out events & blogs at .ORG Buzz!
Find us on Facebook | dotorg
See the .ORG Buzz! Photo Gallery on Flickr
See our video library on YouTube

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTE:
Proprietary and confidential to .ORG, The Public Interest Registry.  If 
received in error, please inform sender and then delete.




-----Original Message-----
From: owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx] On 
Behalf Of Mike O'Connor
Sent: Monday, June 14, 2010 11:23 AM
To: Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: [gnso-vi-feb10] telling the story of VI to the community


hi all,

i've decided that i need to put together a slide deck that can be used to 
update the community on what we've been doing and where we are at.  slightly 
different variants of this deck will be used in at least three meetings during 
Brussels -- the GNSO Council meeting on Sunday, our Public Forum on Wednesday 
and (late-breaking news here) a session with the ALAC (VERY early!) Tuesday 
morning.

i'm starting to build an outline and thought i would ask the rest of you for 
ideas of things we should include.  i figure i'm going for about 5-8 slides 
total, no more than 10 (so's to keep the "presenting" part down to no more than 
10-15 minutes).

here's my starter-list

-- Where we've been
        -- History
        -- Approach (two waves -- fast-scramble followed by deeper-research)
        -- "Unusual" aspects of this effort (time-frame, complex Board/DAG/GNSO 
interaction, etc.)
        -- How hard we've worked (number of emails, proposals, conversations, 
polls, etc.)
-- Where we are now
        -- Either "the short-term deal", or an update on where we are at with 
regard to "the short term deal", or the conclusion that we need more research 
in order to reach consensus
-- Where we are going
        -- Either:
                The 3-4 month path to GNSO/Board policy (if we have "the short 
term deal"), or
                A plea for a little more time, because we feel like we can get 
to a deal soon, or
                The broad outlines of the questions we need to answer to get to 
a deal (eg, economics, regulatory structures, harms, definitions, etc.)
        -- A summary of the longer PDP that addresses the rest of the charter 
questions
                
does that seem like the right outline?  anything huge that's missing?  anything 
huge that makes you unhappy?

i could use a few sounding-board type people, so if anybody's interested in 
volunteering to be editors/improvers let me know.  i figure we'll send a few 
drafts to the list for comment and spend a few minutes at the end of the 
Saturday face-to-face session bringing the slide-deck to final-draft.

mikey


- - - - - - - - -
phone   651-647-6109  
fax             866-280-2356  
web     www.haven2.com
handle  OConnorStP (ID for public places like Twitter, Facebook, Google, etc.)