RE: [gnso-vi-feb10] telling the story of VI to the community
- To: "Mike O'Connor" <mike@xxxxxxxxxx>, <Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [gnso-vi-feb10] telling the story of VI to the community
- From: "Kathy Kleiman" <kKleiman@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2010 11:56:18 -0400
Sorry if I missed it below, but I would include the Table as a major milestone
of the group so far. It is the summary/group compilation/living document of our
work on proposals and our evaluation and agreement of elements.
If you could include the table in your slides, or a portion, with a link to the
full table, I think that would be very helpful for those viewing the slides.
Best and tx,
Director of Policy
.ORG The Public Interest Registry
Direct: +1 703 889-5756 Mobile: +1 703 371-6846
Visit us online!
Check out events & blogs at .ORG Buzz!
Find us on Facebook | dotorg
See the .ORG Buzz! Photo Gallery on Flickr
See our video library on YouTube
Proprietary and confidential to .ORG, The Public Interest Registry. If
received in error, please inform sender and then delete.
From: owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Mike O'Connor
Sent: Monday, June 14, 2010 11:23 AM
Subject: [gnso-vi-feb10] telling the story of VI to the community
i've decided that i need to put together a slide deck that can be used to
update the community on what we've been doing and where we are at. slightly
different variants of this deck will be used in at least three meetings during
Brussels -- the GNSO Council meeting on Sunday, our Public Forum on Wednesday
and (late-breaking news here) a session with the ALAC (VERY early!) Tuesday
i'm starting to build an outline and thought i would ask the rest of you for
ideas of things we should include. i figure i'm going for about 5-8 slides
total, no more than 10 (so's to keep the "presenting" part down to no more than
here's my starter-list
-- Where we've been
-- Approach (two waves -- fast-scramble followed by deeper-research)
-- "Unusual" aspects of this effort (time-frame, complex Board/DAG/GNSO
-- How hard we've worked (number of emails, proposals, conversations,
-- Where we are now
-- Either "the short-term deal", or an update on where we are at with
regard to "the short term deal", or the conclusion that we need more research
in order to reach consensus
-- Where we are going
The 3-4 month path to GNSO/Board policy (if we have "the short
term deal"), or
A plea for a little more time, because we feel like we can get
to a deal soon, or
The broad outlines of the questions we need to answer to get to
a deal (eg, economics, regulatory structures, harms, definitions, etc.)
-- A summary of the longer PDP that addresses the rest of the charter
does that seem like the right outline? anything huge that's missing? anything
huge that makes you unhappy?
i could use a few sounding-board type people, so if anybody's interested in
volunteering to be editors/improvers let me know. i figure we'll send a few
drafts to the list for comment and spend a few minutes at the end of the
Saturday face-to-face session bringing the slide-deck to final-draft.
- - - - - - - - -
handle OConnorStP (ID for public places like Twitter, Facebook, Google, etc.)