<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] Poll -- NEW ONE -- looking at "atoms" this time
- To: tim@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] Poll -- NEW ONE -- looking at "atoms" this time
- From: Olga Cavalli <olgacavalli@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2010 11:25:43 -0300
Hi,
I also find polls confusing, I agree with Tim´s comments.
Regards
Olga
2010/6/14 <tim@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> I'm concerned abt how these polls will be used in the report. I agree with
> Kathy abt the value of the matrix and its use in the report, but these polls
> are confusing.
>
> I will try to get to the current poll later this week (traveling a lot
> until Friday), but suggest that the poll results not be used in the report
> to Council.
>
> Tim
>
> ------Original Message------
> From: Mike O'Connor
> Sender: owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx
> To: Avri Doria
> Cc: Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] Poll -- NEW ONE -- looking at "atoms" this
> time
> Sent: Jun 14, 2010 2:28 PM
>
>
> hi all,
>
> we had a pretty lively conversation on the call about the new poll and
> concluded that we need a redo that makes the choices/answers easier to
> understand. Doodle seems to be at it's limit. so i've closed the Doodle
> one and will push a new one (probably SurveyMonkey based, since i've got an
> account) Real Soon Now.
>
> thanks,
>
>
> mikey
>
>
> - - - - - - - - -
> phone 651-647-6109
> fax 866-280-2356
> web www.haven2.com
> handle OConnorStP (ID for public places like Twitter, Facebook, Google,
> etc.)
>
>
>
>
>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|