Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] Poll -- NEW ONE -- looking at "atoms" this time

["Anthony Harris" <harris@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

I agree with Tim's suggestion.

Tony Harris

----- Original Message ----- 
From: <tim@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, June 14, 2010 11:53 PM
Subject: Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] Poll -- NEW ONE -- looking at "atoms" this time


> I'm concerned abt how these polls will be used in the report. I agree with 
> Kathy abt the value of the matrix and its use in the report, but these 
> polls are confusing.
> I will try to get to the current poll later this week (traveling a lot 
> until Friday), but suggest that the poll results not be used in the report 
> to Council.
> Tim
>
> ------Original Message------
> From: Mike O'Connor
> Sender: owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx
> To: Avri Doria
> Cc: Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] Poll -- NEW ONE -- looking at "atoms" this 
> time
> Sent: Jun 14, 2010 2:28 PM
>
>
> hi all,
>
> we had a pretty lively conversation on the call about the new poll and 
> concluded that we need a redo that makes the choices/answers easier to 
> understand.  Doodle seems to be at it's limit.  so i've closed the Doodle 
> one and will push a new one (probably SurveyMonkey based, since i've got 
> an account) Real Soon Now.
> thanks,
>
>
> mikey
>
>
> - - - - - - - - -
> phone 651-647-6109
> fax  866-280-2356
> web www.haven2.com
> handle OConnorStP (ID for public places like Twitter, Facebook, Google, 
> etc.)