<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] a contribution on the compliance issue
- To: "'avri@xxxxxxx'" <avri@xxxxxxx>, "'Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx'" <Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] a contribution on the compliance issue
- From: Jeff Eckhaus <eckhaus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 20 Jun 2010 01:41:43 -0700
I would also like to add that I spoke to David Giza of ICANN Compliance and he
would like to join the group to help us wade through the issues.
----- Original Message -----
From: owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx <owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx>
To: Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx <Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Sun Jun 20 01:30:09 2010
Subject: [gnso-vi-feb10] a contribution on the compliance issue
Hi,
Was talking to Wendy Seltzer and she asked that I inject this comment into our
discussion on compliance.
"There are several ways of dealing with compliance problems: Give ICANN less to
enforce by stripping the requirements; or take some of the burden off ICANN by
enabling other affected parties to enforce the contracts. Just as public law
often enables private parties to enforce statutes for the benefit of the
public, contracts can permit third-party beneficiaries to sue to enforce their
terms."
a.
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|