Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] a contribution on the compliance issue

[Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>]

Hi,

I think that is a great idea.  Instead of talking about compliance, we could 
talk with compliance.

a.

On 20 Jun 2010, at 10:41, Jeff Eckhaus wrote:

> I would also like to add that I spoke to David Giza of ICANN Compliance and 
> he would like to join the group to help us wade through the issues. 
> 
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx <owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx>
> To: Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx <Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Sun Jun 20 01:30:09 2010
> Subject: [gnso-vi-feb10] a contribution on the compliance issue
> 
> 
> Hi,
> 
> Was talking to Wendy Seltzer and she asked that I inject this comment into 
> our discussion on compliance.
> 
> 
> "There are several ways of dealing with compliance problems: Give ICANN less 
> to enforce by stripping the requirements; or take some of the burden off 
> ICANN by enabling other affected parties to enforce the contracts.  Just as 
> public law often enables private parties to enforce statutes for the benefit 
> of the public, contracts can permit third-party beneficiaries to sue to 
> enforce their terms."
> 
> a.
> 
>