Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] a contribution on the compliance issue

["Phil Buckingham" <pjbuckingham@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi All,

I also spoke with David Giza , Saturday.


As an ex auditor , CPA ( equiv) I would like to set up a team to link the VI 
WG with David Giza ( Compliance) and Kevin Wilson ( CFO) . Mike Salazar ( 
implementation of gTLDs ) is the frame - but is not in Brussels.
We are planning a meeting , most likely , Wednesday.

Who would like to join the team ?

Ken , as a CPA , I think  you need to be on the team.

My understanding is ICANN would prefer to beef up compliance inhouse , 
rather than outsource ( to a global accounting firm)
regards

Phil Buckingham

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Avri Doria" <avri@xxxxxxx>
To: <Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Sunday, June 20, 2010 9:55 AM
Subject: Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] a contribution on the compliance issue


> Hi,
>
> I think that is a great idea.  Instead of talking about compliance, we 
> could talk with compliance.
> a.
>
> On 20 Jun 2010, at 10:41, Jeff Eckhaus wrote:
>
> > I would also like to add that I spoke to David Giza of ICANN Compliance 
> > and he would like to join the group to help us wade through the issues.
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx <owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx>
> > To: Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx <Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx>
> > Sent: Sun Jun 20 01:30:09 2010
> > Subject: [gnso-vi-feb10] a contribution on the compliance issue
> >
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > Was talking to Wendy Seltzer and she asked that I inject this comment 
> > into our discussion on compliance.
> >
> > "There are several ways of dealing with compliance problems: Give ICANN 
> > less to enforce by stripping the requirements; or take some of the burden 
> > off ICANN by enabling other affected parties to enforce the contracts. 
> > Just as public law often enables private parties to enforce statutes for 
> > the benefit of the public, contracts can permit third-party beneficiaries 
> > to sue to enforce their terms."
> > a.