<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [gnso-vi-feb10] a contribution on the compliance issue
- To: <Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [gnso-vi-feb10] a contribution on the compliance issue
- From: "Ron Andruff" <randruff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 20 Jun 2010 07:31:12 -0400
David Giza appears to be being invited to participate by many VI WG members
to many different fora. May I suggest to the Co-chairs that we invite him
to meet with all of us here at the hoped-for 2nd F2F meeting, or on our next
call? I don't think it serves the larger WG for him to meet with subsets of
us.
Kind regards,
RA
Ronald N. Andruff
RNA Partners, Inc.
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Phil Buckingham
Sent: Sunday, June 20, 2010 5:25 AM
To: Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx; Avri Doria
Cc: Ken Stubbs; Kevin Wilson; david.giza@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] a contribution on the compliance issue
Hi All,
I also spoke with David Giza , Saturday.
As an ex auditor , CPA ( equiv) I would like to set up a team to link the VI
WG with David Giza ( Compliance) and Kevin Wilson ( CFO) . Mike Salazar (
implementation of gTLDs ) is the frame - but is not in Brussels.
We are planning a meeting , most likely , Wednesday.
Who would like to join the team ?
Ken , as a CPA , I think you need to be on the team.
My understanding is ICANN would prefer to beef up compliance inhouse ,
rather than outsource ( to a global accounting firm)
regards
Phil Buckingham
----- Original Message -----
From: "Avri Doria" <avri@xxxxxxx>
To: <Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Sunday, June 20, 2010 9:55 AM
Subject: Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] a contribution on the compliance issue
>
> Hi,
>
> I think that is a great idea. Instead of talking about compliance, we
> could talk with compliance.
>
> a.
>
> On 20 Jun 2010, at 10:41, Jeff Eckhaus wrote:
>
>> I would also like to add that I spoke to David Giza of ICANN Compliance
>> and he would like to join the group to help us wade through the issues.
>>
>>
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx <owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx>
>> To: Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx <Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx>
>> Sent: Sun Jun 20 01:30:09 2010
>> Subject: [gnso-vi-feb10] a contribution on the compliance issue
>>
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Was talking to Wendy Seltzer and she asked that I inject this comment
>> into our discussion on compliance.
>>
>>
>> "There are several ways of dealing with compliance problems: Give ICANN
>> less to enforce by stripping the requirements; or take some of the burden
>> off ICANN by enabling other affected parties to enforce the contracts.
>> Just as public law often enables private parties to enforce statutes for
>> the benefit of the public, contracts can permit third-party beneficiaries
>> to sue to enforce their terms."
>>
>> a.
>>
>>
>
>
>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|