RE: [gnso-vi-feb10] a contribution on the compliance issue

["Neuman, Jeff" <Jeff.Neuman@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Agreed.  

Jeffrey J. Neuman 
Neustar, Inc. / Vice President, Law & Policy


The information contained in this e-mail message is intended only for the use 
of the recipient(s) named above and may contain confidential and/or privileged 
information. If you are not the intended recipient you have received this 
e-mail message in error and any review, dissemination, distribution, or copying 
of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication 
in error, please notify us immediately and delete the original message.



-----Original Message-----
From: owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx] On 
Behalf Of Ron Andruff
Sent: Sunday, June 20, 2010 1:31 PM
To: Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx
Cc: 'Kevin Wilson'; david.giza@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [gnso-vi-feb10] a contribution on the compliance issue


David Giza appears to be being invited to participate by many VI WG members
to many different fora.  May I suggest to the Co-chairs that we invite him
to meet with all of us here at the hoped-for 2nd F2F meeting, or on our next
call?  I don't think it serves the larger WG for him to meet with subsets of
us.

Kind regards,

RA

Ronald N. Andruff
RNA Partners, Inc.
 


-----Original Message-----
From: owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Phil Buckingham
Sent: Sunday, June 20, 2010 5:25 AM
To: Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx; Avri Doria
Cc: Ken Stubbs; Kevin Wilson; david.giza@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] a contribution on the compliance issue


Hi All,

I also spoke with David Giza , Saturday.


As an ex auditor , CPA ( equiv) I would like to set up a team to link the VI

WG with David Giza ( Compliance) and Kevin Wilson ( CFO) . Mike Salazar ( 
implementation of gTLDs ) is the frame - but is not in Brussels.

We are planning a meeting , most likely , Wednesday.

Who would like to join the team ?

Ken , as a CPA , I think  you need to be on the team.

My understanding is ICANN would prefer to beef up compliance inhouse , 
rather than outsource ( to a global accounting firm)

regards

Phil Buckingham

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Avri Doria" <avri@xxxxxxx>
To: <Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Sunday, June 20, 2010 9:55 AM
Subject: Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] a contribution on the compliance issue


>
> Hi,
>
> I think that is a great idea.  Instead of talking about compliance, we 
> could talk with compliance.
>
> a.
>
> On 20 Jun 2010, at 10:41, Jeff Eckhaus wrote:
>
>> I would also like to add that I spoke to David Giza of ICANN Compliance 
>> and he would like to join the group to help us wade through the issues.
>>
>>
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx <owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx>
>> To: Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx <Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx>
>> Sent: Sun Jun 20 01:30:09 2010
>> Subject: [gnso-vi-feb10] a contribution on the compliance issue
>>
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Was talking to Wendy Seltzer and she asked that I inject this comment 
>> into our discussion on compliance.
>>
>>
>> "There are several ways of dealing with compliance problems: Give ICANN 
>> less to enforce by stripping the requirements; or take some of the burden

>> off ICANN by enabling other affected parties to enforce the contracts. 
>> Just as public law often enables private parties to enforce statutes for 
>> the benefit of the public, contracts can permit third-party beneficiaries

>> to sue to enforce their terms."
>>
>> a.
>>
>>
>
>
>