<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [gnso-vi-feb10] Private GNSO Council meeting with Board on VI
- To: "'Gomes, Chuck'" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, <Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [gnso-vi-feb10] Private GNSO Council meeting with Board on VI
- From: "Ron Andruff" <randruff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2010 08:27:08 -0400
Thank you for letting us know, Chuck. Two questions:
1. On what basis did you call a meeting with the board on a topic that
has been delegated to a WG?
2. Why were the co-chairs of the WG not invited?
I'm not trying to take this WG off on a tangent for but, for many of us,
this meeting does appear highly unusual and somewhat discomfiting.
Thanks,
RA
Ronald N. Andruff
RNA Partners, Inc.
_____
From: owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Gomes, Chuck
Sent: Tuesday, June 22, 2010 7:57 AM
To: Ron Andruff; Neuman, Jeff; Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [gnso-vi-feb10] Private GNSO Council meeting with Board on VI
Ron,
I called it.
Chuck
From: owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Ron Andruff
Sent: Tuesday, June 22, 2010 6:19 AM
To: 'Neuman, Jeff'; Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [gnso-vi-feb10] Private GNSO Council meeting with Board on VI
Agreed, Jeff. It is completely inappropriate for the Council to meet with
the Board on a topic that has been given to a Working Group to determine. I
would also be interested in knowing who called this meeting as well.
RA
Ronald N. Andruff
RNA Partners, Inc.
_____
From: owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Neuman, Jeff
Sent: Tuesday, June 22, 2010 4:32 AM
To: Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: [gnso-vi-feb10] Private GNSO Council meeting with Board on VI
I understand that yesterday a "private" meeting was called between the GNSO
Council and Board members on Vertical Integration. Can a councilor please
(1) explain to us why this meeting was called with the Council as opposed to
the VI Group and (2) document for the record what was discussed and/or
decided.
I plan on addressing this separately, but I am not sure that these types of
meetings should occur especially when the issue is under the jurisdiction of
the Working Group NOT the Council. This is contrary to the bottom up
process.
Best regards,
Jeffrey J. Neuman
Neustar, Inc. / Vice President, Law & Policy
46000 Center Oak Plaza Sterling, VA 20166
Office: +1.571.434.5772 Mobile: +1.202.549.5079 Fax: +1.703.738.7965 /
<mailto:jeff.neuman@xxxxxxxxxxx> jeff.neuman@xxxxxxxxxxx /
<http://www.neustar.biz/> www.neustar.biz
_____
The information contained in this e-mail message is intended only for the
use of the recipient(s) named above and may contain confidential and/or
privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient you have
received this e-mail message in error and any review, dissemination,
distribution, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have
received this communication in error, please notify us immediately and
delete the original message.
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|