<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [gnso-vi-feb10] Private GNSO Council meeting with Board on VI
- To: "Ron Andruff" <randruff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [gnso-vi-feb10] Private GNSO Council meeting with Board on VI
- From: "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2010 12:51:07 -0400
Ron,
If the co-chairs would like me to answer these questions, I would be
happy to do so for the entire WG but I think that would be much easier
to do in person, possibly at your in-person meeting which I think is
being held on Thursday. The reason I suggest that is because I suspect
that my answers to your questions will generate other questions and so
on and because there were a lot of factors involved.
Chuck
From: Ron Andruff [mailto:randruff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Tuesday, June 22, 2010 8:27 AM
To: Gomes, Chuck; Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [gnso-vi-feb10] Private GNSO Council meeting with Board on
VI
Thank you for letting us know, Chuck. Two questions:
1. On what basis did you call a meeting with the board on a topic
that has been delegated to a WG?
2. Why were the co-chairs of the WG not invited?
I'm not trying to take this WG off on a tangent for but, for many of us,
this meeting does appear highly unusual and somewhat discomfiting.
Thanks,
RA
Ronald N. Andruff
RNA Partners, Inc.
________________________________
From: owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Gomes, Chuck
Sent: Tuesday, June 22, 2010 7:57 AM
To: Ron Andruff; Neuman, Jeff; Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [gnso-vi-feb10] Private GNSO Council meeting with Board on
VI
Ron,
I called it.
Chuck
From: owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Ron Andruff
Sent: Tuesday, June 22, 2010 6:19 AM
To: 'Neuman, Jeff'; Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [gnso-vi-feb10] Private GNSO Council meeting with Board on
VI
Agreed, Jeff. It is completely inappropriate for the Council to meet
with the Board on a topic that has been given to a Working Group to
determine. I would also be interested in knowing who called this
meeting as well.
RA
Ronald N. Andruff
RNA Partners, Inc.
________________________________
From: owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Neuman, Jeff
Sent: Tuesday, June 22, 2010 4:32 AM
To: Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: [gnso-vi-feb10] Private GNSO Council meeting with Board on VI
I understand that yesterday a "private" meeting was called between the
GNSO Council and Board members on Vertical Integration. Can a councilor
please (1) explain to us why this meeting was called with the Council as
opposed to the VI Group and (2) document for the record what was
discussed and/or decided.
I plan on addressing this separately, but I am not sure that these types
of meetings should occur especially when the issue is under the
jurisdiction of the Working Group NOT the Council. This is contrary to
the bottom up process.
Best regards,
Jeffrey J. Neuman
Neustar, Inc. / Vice President, Law & Policy
46000 Center Oak Plaza Sterling, VA 20166
Office: +1.571.434.5772 Mobile: +1.202.549.5079 Fax: +1.703.738.7965 /
jeff.neuman@xxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:jeff.neuman@xxxxxxxxxxx> /
www.neustar.biz <http://www.neustar.biz/>
________________________________
The information contained in this e-mail message is intended only for
the use of the recipient(s) named above and may contain confidential
and/or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient you
have received this e-mail message in error and any review,
dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message is strictly
prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please
notify us immediately and delete the original message.
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|