RE: [gnso-vi-feb10] call for agenda items... and Something Completely Different

[Milton L Mueller <mueller@xxxxxxx>]

That would represent backwards movement. The two molecules that came out of 
Brussels both deviated substantially from JN2 and RACK. Are you suggesting we 
ignore that work? 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-vi-
> feb10@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Eric Brunner-Williams
> Sent: Thursday, July 01, 2010 10:36 AM
> To: Drazek, Keith
> Cc: mike@xxxxxxxxxx; Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] call for agenda items... and Something
> Completely Different
> 
> 
> I've the impression that narrow discussion of the possible areas of
> resolvable difference between the variations of the original JN2 and
> RACK+ proposals will be of general utility.
> 
> Eric
> 
> On 7/1/10 10:09 AM, Drazek, Keith wrote:
> >
> > To clarify my question, with the limited amount of time remaining, we
> need to be very specific about what the current options are, and what
> exactly will be up for a vote. The 2 main proposals/molecules produced
> in our Saturday F2F in Brussels are variations of the original JN2 and
> RACK+ proposals, but are not the same. Which proposals are we now
> discussing/considering? Thanks, Keith
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: Drazek, Keith
> > To: 'mike@xxxxxxxxxx'<mike@xxxxxxxxxx>; 'Gnso-vi-
> feb10@xxxxxxxxx'<Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx>
> > Sent: Thu Jul 01 09:26:38 2010
> > Subject: Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] call for agenda items...  and Something
> Completely Different
> >
> > Thanks Mikey. Are the "major proposals" the 3 produced by our
> Saturday session in Brussels?
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx<owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx>
> > To: Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx<Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx>
> > Sent: Thu Jul 01 09:04:05 2010
> > Subject: [gnso-vi-feb10] call for agenda items...  and Something
> Completely Different
> >
> >
> > hi all,
> >
> > my lameness is overwhelming me today -- i forgot to send out a call
> for agenda items yesterday.  sorry about that.
> >
> > the primary thing on my mind is launching this last little sprint to
> the finish line.  so my thought is to talk about the mechanics of that.
> since it's not a real complicated plan, any time left over can be used
> to do anything you would like to do.
> >
> > proposed agenda items
> >
> > - review agenda
> > - roll call
> > - review short-term plan
> > - identify editorial leaders for each major proposal (including
> DAGv4)
> > - identify minority viewpoints that aren't reflected in the major
> proposals and figure out how/where they can be addressed
> > - any other business
> >
> > anything else people would like to add?
> >
> > and now for Something Completely Different...
> >
> > here's video of your co-chairs rockin' the house at Music Night.  we
> had a terrible time.  hated every minute.  but we did it for YOU!
> aren't we dedicated, self-sacrificing co-chairs?  :-)
> >
> > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=31JgOM8j3BU
> >
> > um...  it's rock and roll.  so if that kind of thing is forbidden at
> your work-place, you might want to wait until you get home before
> playing the video.
> >
> > mikey
> >
> >
> > - - - - - - - - -
> > phone       651-647-6109
> > fax                 866-280-2356
> > web         www.haven2.com
> > handle      OConnorStP (ID for public places like Twitter, Facebook,
> Google, etc.)
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >