RE: [gnso-vi-feb10] call for agenda items... and Something Completely Different

["Kathy Kleiman" <kKleiman@xxxxxxx>]

I'm with Milton on this one. The two molecules that came out of our 4 hour Sat 
VI meeting in Brussels represented some considerable movement and discussion 
(and I say that as the minority in the group I was in). I think converging 
around these two poles (based largely on JN2 and RACK+, but with much added 
from the groups in Brussels) is a good way to proceed.

Best,

Kathy Kleiman
Director of Policy
.ORG The Public Interest Registry
Direct: +1 703 889-5756  Mobile: +1 703 371-6846

Visit us online!
Check out events & blogs at .ORG Buzz!
Find us on Facebook | dotorg
See the .ORG Buzz! Photo Gallery on Flickr
See our video library on YouTube

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTE:
Proprietary and confidential to .ORG, The Public Interest Registry.  If 
received in error, please inform sender and then delete.




-----Original Message-----
From: owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx] On 
Behalf Of Milton L Mueller
Sent: Thursday, July 01, 2010 10:56 AM
To: 'Eric Brunner-Williams'; Drazek, Keith
Cc: mike@xxxxxxxxxx; Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [gnso-vi-feb10] call for agenda items... and Something Completely 
Different


That would represent backwards movement. The two molecules that came out of 
Brussels both deviated substantially from JN2 and RACK. Are you suggesting we 
ignore that work? 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-vi-
> feb10@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Eric Brunner-Williams
> Sent: Thursday, July 01, 2010 10:36 AM
> To: Drazek, Keith
> Cc: mike@xxxxxxxxxx; Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] call for agenda items... and Something
> Completely Different
> 
> 
> I've the impression that narrow discussion of the possible areas of
> resolvable difference between the variations of the original JN2 and
> RACK+ proposals will be of general utility.
> 
> Eric
> 
> On 7/1/10 10:09 AM, Drazek, Keith wrote:
> >
> > To clarify my question, with the limited amount of time remaining, we
> need to be very specific about what the current options are, and what
> exactly will be up for a vote. The 2 main proposals/molecules produced
> in our Saturday F2F in Brussels are variations of the original JN2 and
> RACK+ proposals, but are not the same. Which proposals are we now
> discussing/considering? Thanks, Keith
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: Drazek, Keith
> > To: 'mike@xxxxxxxxxx'<mike@xxxxxxxxxx>; 'Gnso-vi-
> feb10@xxxxxxxxx'<Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx>
> > Sent: Thu Jul 01 09:26:38 2010
> > Subject: Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] call for agenda items...  and Something
> Completely Different
> >
> > Thanks Mikey. Are the "major proposals" the 3 produced by our
> Saturday session in Brussels?
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx<owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx>
> > To: Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx<Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx>
> > Sent: Thu Jul 01 09:04:05 2010
> > Subject: [gnso-vi-feb10] call for agenda items...  and Something
> Completely Different
> >
> >
> > hi all,
> >
> > my lameness is overwhelming me today -- i forgot to send out a call
> for agenda items yesterday.  sorry about that.
> >
> > the primary thing on my mind is launching this last little sprint to
> the finish line.  so my thought is to talk about the mechanics of that.
> since it's not a real complicated plan, any time left over can be used
> to do anything you would like to do.
> >
> > proposed agenda items
> >
> > - review agenda
> > - roll call
> > - review short-term plan
> > - identify editorial leaders for each major proposal (including
> DAGv4)
> > - identify minority viewpoints that aren't reflected in the major
> proposals and figure out how/where they can be addressed
> > - any other business
> >
> > anything else people would like to add?
> >
> > and now for Something Completely Different...
> >
> > here's video of your co-chairs rockin' the house at Music Night.  we
> had a terrible time.  hated every minute.  but we did it for YOU!
> aren't we dedicated, self-sacrificing co-chairs?  :-)
> >
> > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=31JgOM8j3BU
> >
> > um...  it's rock and roll.  so if that kind of thing is forbidden at
> your work-place, you might want to wait until you get home before
> playing the video.
> >
> > mikey
> >
> >
> > - - - - - - - - -
> > phone       651-647-6109
> > fax                 866-280-2356
> > web         www.haven2.com
> > handle      OConnorStP (ID for public places like Twitter, Facebook,
> Google, etc.)
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >