<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] call for agenda items... and Something Completely Different
- To: Kathy Kleiman <kKleiman@xxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] call for agenda items... and Something Completely Different
- From: Eric Brunner-Williams <ebw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 01 Jul 2010 12:50:30 -0400
I'll pass. If there is follow-up to were we were at at the close of
the 11am final face to face session meeting in Room 311/312, I guess
it will have to be off-list.
The "I wasn't there", "it's not my holiday", "all views haven't been
considered", ... isn't closing on anything except an end date.
Eric
On 7/1/10 12:05 PM, Kathy Kleiman wrote:
I'm with Milton on this one. The two molecules that came out of our 4 hour Sat
VI meeting in Brussels represented some considerable movement and discussion
(and I say that as the minority in the group I was in). I think converging
around these two poles (based largely on JN2 and RACK+, but with much added
from the groups in Brussels) is a good way to proceed.
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|