Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] agenda for today's call

["Mike O'Connor" <mike@xxxxxxxxxx>]

ah.  sorry Tim, a slight confusion -- i'm not talking about doing polls on the 
call.  i'm talking about that scheme i outlined on the last call where we 
document the major proposals and *then* do a poll (over the weekend).  my main 
goal today is to make sure we've got "editorial leaders" for each of the major 
proposals...

mikey


On Jul 5, 2010, at 11:33 AM, Tim Ruiz wrote:

> These calls rarely have all the active participants on them, and this
> one may even be less given the US holiday. So while most may still deem
> a call to be useful, I don't believe any poll done on the call itself
> can be truly representative.
> 
> 
> Tim
> 
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: [gnso-vi-feb10] agenda for today's call
> From: "Mike O'Connor" <mike@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Mon, July 05, 2010 11:21 am
> To: Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx
> 
> 
> hi all,
> 
> here's the preliminary agenda for the call today
> 
> Review agenda -- 5 minutes
> 
> Roll call
> 
> "Document positions and do a poll" process -- 20 minutes
> 
> "Identify a few topics around which there may be consensus" process --
> 60 minutes
> -- SRSU
> -- Niche TLDs
> -- Are there others? Candidates could include;
> -- Concerns over ICANN compliance
> -- Something other than DAGv4 2% ownership limit
> 
> Any other business
> 
> mikey
> 
> - - - - - - - - -
> phone 651-647-6109 
> fax 866-280-2356 
> web http://www.haven2.com
> handle OConnorStP (ID for public places like Twitter, Facebook, Google,
> etc.)

- - - - - - - - -
phone   651-647-6109  
fax             866-280-2356  
web     http://www.haven2.com
handle  OConnorStP (ID for public places like Twitter, Facebook, Google, etc.)