Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] SRSU/SRMU
- To: "Rosette, Kristina" <krosette@xxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] SRSU/SRMU
- From: Volker Greimann - Key-Systems GmbH <vgreimann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 08 Jul 2010 14:32:29 +0200
effectively, you are proposing to have strict rules and regulations, but
these should please not apply for your constituency. Effectively, any
trademark that existed before your cutoff date could apply for its own
TLD, which it would also be able to sell and distribute directly, if it
I disagree with your allowing SRMU and MRMU models without equal
registrar access, obviously, and refer to my previous messages to that
I also disagree with the partisan approach of if ok is a trademark owner
does it, but no one else is good enough for these exceptions. What makes
trademark owners special of such special consideration?
I've attached a condensed version of the IPC Constituency Statement.
(I've removed all of the template language.) It contains the numerous
conditions and limitations we recommended and I thought those may be
helpful to the SRSU group.
I've fallen behind on the list, but plan to start with the 1 July
posts and work forward.