ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[gnso-vi-feb10]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] Another drafting effort -- "Response to DAGv4 2% limitation"

  • To: Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx
  • Subject: Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] Another drafting effort -- "Response to DAGv4 2% limitation"
  • From: Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 8 Jul 2010 09:07:40 -0400

Hi,

In this case I agree with Jon.

If we aren't willing to reach compromise now, why would an extra week or so 
change that?

a.

On 8 Jul 2010, at 08:59, Mike O'Connor wrote:

> sure -- or we can just drop it.  
> 
> 
> On Jul 8, 2010, at 7:56 AM, Jon Nevett wrote:
> 
>> I don't agree with the first bullet at all.  Can we discuss this on our call 
>> today?
>> 
>> Thanks.
>> 
>> Jon
>> 
>> 
>> On Jul 8, 2010, at 8:47 AM, Mike O'Connor wrote:
>> 
>>> hi all,
>>> 
>>> during the last call i abruptly changed my mind about the need to launch a 
>>> "reaction to current DAGv4" paragraph -- going with Amadeu's suggestion 
>>> that we just do a poll instead.  now i've changed my mind back -- i think 
>>> we still need a paragraph or two to describe the question and frame it for 
>>> us to vote on.  so i've appointed myself the convener of a little sub-group 
>>> to write this section and invite anybody who's interested to join me (just 
>>> chime in on the list if you see something that needs to be fixed).
>>> 
>>> here's a sketch of the language i'm thinking we need to write -- i don't 
>>> think this needs to be real long.
>>> 
>>> - the group needs more time to arrive at a consensus view of the larger 
>>> issue of VI and cross-ownership,
>>> 
>>> - but there is [some kind of consensus, to be determined with a poll] that 
>>> the current 2% limitation in DAGv4 is unworkably low and needs, at a 
>>> minimum, to be increased in order to align with the ownership-disclosure 
>>> requirements for public companies around the world (Jeff Neuman's point -- 
>>> jazzed up with the need to accommodate more than just US securities law).
>>> 
>>> - there was also [some kind of consensus, to be determined with a poll] 
>>> that setting the threshold at 15% was desirable in that it would be similar 
>>> to current practice in most existing TLDs
>>> 
>>> anybody want to help me tune this up?  
>>> 
>>> mikey
>>> 
>>> 
>>> - - - - - - - - -
>>> phone       651-647-6109  
>>> fax                 866-280-2356  
>>> web         http://www.haven2.com
>>> handle      OConnorStP (ID for public places like Twitter, Facebook, 
>>> Google, etc.)
>>> 
>> 
> 
> - - - - - - - - -
> phone         651-647-6109  
> fax           866-280-2356  
> web   http://www.haven2.com
> handle        OConnorStP (ID for public places like Twitter, Facebook, 
> Google, etc.)
> 





<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy