[gnso-vi-feb10] suggested edits & questions

[Ken Stubbs <kstubbs@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

 Ken Stubbs wrote:

some suggested edits:

pg 4 : paragraph currently reads:

As described more fully below, the VI Working Group has not reached a 
consensus on any recommended proposed model on vertical integration for 
the New gTLD Program. However, several principles are supported by a 
[consensus] of the VI Working Group members. A [consensus] of VI Working 
Group supports the principle that compliance, and enforcement thereof, 
should be a fundamental part of the New gTLD Program. As a result, a 
detailed compliance program should be defined, and appropriate resources 
should allocated by ICANN, as it finalizes its implementation details 
for the New gTLD Program
suggested wording: (change in parens)
As described more fully below, the VI Working Group has not reached a 
consensus on any "proposals" on vertical integration for the New gTLD 
Program. However, several principles are supported by a [consensus] of 
the VI Working Group members. A [consensus] of VI Working Group supports 
the principle that compliance, and enforcement thereof, should be a 
fundamental part of the New gTLD Program. As a result, a detailed 
compliance program should be defined, and appropriate resources should 
allocated by ICANN, as it finalizes its implementation details for the 
New gTLD Program

in section 5.3...


 Special Consideration for a Single Registrant, Single User (SRSU)
 Exception.

   What does the word "special" in the heading mean ?




On 7/14/2010 10:23 PM, Margie Milam wrote:
> Dear All,
>
> In preparation for the call VI call tomorrow,  please find attached 
> the First Draft of the Initial Report for your review and consideration.
> As you review this Draft, please note that:
>
> · Due to the size of the document (currently over 90 pages!)  I have 
> excluded the annexes and provide only the text of the report.
> · The SRSU description is especially thin and needs further content 
> from IPC representatives and from NCSG representatives.
> · Please disregard any formatting issues as I will be doing a more 
> thorough review of the document as it becomes more final.
> · Once the results of the poll are in,  someone will need to draft 
> content with any observations that to be included in Section 6.
> Unfortunately, I will not be on tomorrow's call, but Marika will 
> manage the call in my absence.    I will be in an all-day meeting in 
> MDR, and will follow up with Marika after the VI call.
> Best regards,
>
> Margie
>
> ____________
>
> Margie Milam
>
> Senior Policy Counselor
>
> ICANN
>
> ____________