RE: [gnso-vi-feb10] interesting results from poll re: proposals

[Jeff Eckhaus <eckhaus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

If DAGv4 was 15% wouldn't it be RACK ?

I do think that the other proposals were not strictly about the numbers. They 
were about competition and distribution and most thought the number and 
percentages were arbitrary that is why we did not see proposals at 20%, 40% or 
70%

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx] On 
Behalf Of tim@xxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Thursday, July 15, 2010 2:44 PM
To: Milton L Mueller
Cc: Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] interesting results from poll re: proposals


Exactly.
------Original Message------
From: Milton L Mueller
To: Tim Ruiz
Cc: Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [gnso-vi-feb10] interesting results from poll re: proposals
Sent: Jul 15, 2010 4:40 PM

If DAGv4 was 5%, 10%, or 15% it wouldn't be DAGv4.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tim Ruiz [mailto:tim@xxxxxxxxxxx]
>
> Wonder how that might change if DAGv4 was 5%, 10%, 15% instead of 2%?
> Maybe we should poll that :)
>
> Tim
>



Please NOTE: This electronic message, including any attachments, may include 
privileged, confidential and/or inside information owned by Demand Media, Inc. 
Any distribution or use of this communication by anyone other than the intended 
recipient(s) is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful.  If you are not the 
intended recipient, please notify the sender by replying to this message and 
then delete it from your system. Thank you.