[gnso-vi-feb10] RE: SRSU
- To: "Neuman, Jeff" <Jeff.Neuman@xxxxxxxxxx>, "Rosette, Kristina" <krosette@xxxxxxx>, "gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx" <gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [gnso-vi-feb10] RE: SRSU
- From: Milton L Mueller <mueller@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2010 11:32:18 -0400
I don't understand this, Jeff N. It seems uncharacteristically unreasonable.
If we are in an "exceptions" procedure (which is forced on us by incumbent
registries and registrars who are worried about encroachment on their markets
by other actors) then clearly a major registry or registrar is not an
"exception." You are already well-ensconced in the dns registration business
and don't need exceptions to get into it. This is just common sense.
> -----Original Message-----
> For the record, I do support (and have always supported), the SRSU
> exception. But now I must state that if the IPC version is the one that
> is put forward by the VI-WG, I would have to withdraw our support for
> the exception and would think the other contracted parties would follow
> suit as a matter of principal. The discrimination of 1-class of
> applicants for no justifiable reason is not something we should endorse.
> Best regards,