<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] Revised SRSU draft text
- To: "Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx" <gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] Revised SRSU draft text
- From: Richard Tindal <richardtindal@xxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2010 08:42:57 -0700
There's a bit of a conundrum here. SRMU was, and is, in the IPC Proposal. So
to the extent the IPC Proposal is described in the report presumably SRMU will
be also.
SRSU (with a relatively detailed definition) was also in the BRU1 molecule and
SRSU (without a precise definition) was a Poll question that got a good level
of support.
I think a reasonable description for the report is that "SRSU as a general
principle had good support from the group, but that SRMU as a principle did
not" .
Kristina -- Is that a fair description?
RT
On Jul 16, 2010, at 8:31 AM, Volker Greimann - Key-Systems GmbH wrote:
>
> We should define what wemean by SRSU, describe some part of the discussion,
> and eliminate the restatement of the IPC report. I agree on leaving out SRMU.
>
> Volker
>>
>> I, too, agree with Kathy and Cheryl. The term ‘SRMU’ should not appear in
>> this interim report. It had no traction from any quarter in the brief
>> discussions that took place around it.
>>
>> RA
>>
>> Ronald N. Andruff
>>
>> RNA Partners, Inc.
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> *From:* owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx]
>> *On Behalf Of *Cheryl Langdon-Orr
>> *Sent:* Friday, July 16, 2010 10:53 AM
>> *To:* gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx
>> *Subject:* Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] Revised SRSU draft text
>>
>> I agree with you on this matter Kathy
>> Cheryl Langdon-Orr
>> (CLO)
>>
>>
>> On 17 July 2010 00:23, Kathy Kleiman <kKleiman@xxxxxxx
>> <mailto:kKleiman@xxxxxxx>> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Kristina,
>>
>> I really appreciate your drafting this material, and additional details for
>> our reviews. I am concerned that a number of new elements are being added to
>> this material – SRSU now including SRMU. That’s new for this section, and
>> merits review and consideration.
>>
>> Best,
>>
>> *Kathy Kleiman*
>>
>> *Director of Policy*
>>
>> *.ORG The Public Interest Registry*
>>
>> *Direct: +1 703 889-5756 Mobile: +1 703 371-6846*
>>
>> * *
>>
>> *Visit us online!*
>>
>> Check out events & blogs at .ORG Buzz! <http://www.pir.org/orgbuzz>
>>
>> Find us on Facebook | dotorg
>> <http://www.facebook.com/pages/dotorg/203294399456?v=wall>
>>
>> See the .ORG Buzz! Photo Gallery on Flickr <http://flickr.com/orgbuzz>
>>
>> See our video library on YouTube <http://youtube.com/orgbuzz>
>>
>> *CONFIDENTIALITY NOTE:*
>>
>> Proprietary and confidential to .ORG, The Public Interest Registry. If
>> received in error, please inform sender and then delete.
>>
>> *From:* owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx>
>> [mailto:owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx
>> <mailto:owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx>] *On Behalf Of *Rosette, Kristina
>> *Sent:* Friday, July 16, 2010 1:08 AM
>> *To:* gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx>
>> *Subject:* [gnso-vi-feb10] Revised SRSU draft text
>>
>> All,
>>
>> Here's revised SRSU draft text. In the interests of time, I am sending this
>> to the list even though Milton and Avri have not had a chance to review it.
>> It's subject to any changes they may have.
>>
>> I've also included, for completeness, reference to the SRMU exception that
>> the IPC proposed.
>>
>> One section I have not included is the level of support. Milton and I both
>> believe that there may be consensus support for the SRSU exception among the
>> non-contracted party house members of the WG. If we could determine that on
>> the list (as opposed to on the call), I can add the relevant text.
>>
>> K
>>
>> <<07162010 SR Initial Report text.DOC>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Bei weiteren Fragen stehen wir Ihnen gerne zur Verfügung.
>
> Mit freundlichen Grüßen,
>
> Volker A. Greimann
> - Rechtsabteilung -
>
> Key-Systems GmbH
> Im Oberen Werk 1
> 66386 St. Ingbert
> Tel.: +49 (0) 6894 - 9396 901
> Fax.: +49 (0) 6894 - 9396 851
> Email: vgreimann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> Web: www.key-systems.net / www.RRPproxy.net
> www.domaindiscount24.com / www.BrandShelter.com
>
> Folgen Sie uns bei Twitter oder werden Sie unser Fan bei Facebook:
> www.key-systems.net/facebook
> www.twitter.com/key_systems
>
> Geschäftsführer: Alexander Siffrin
> Handelsregister Nr.: HR B 1861 - Zweibruecken
> Umsatzsteuer ID.: DE211006534
>
> Der Inhalt dieser Nachricht ist vertraulich und nur für den angegebenen
> Empfänger bestimmt. Jede Form der Kenntnisgabe, Veröffentlichung oder
> Weitergabe an Dritte durch den Empfänger ist unzulässig. Sollte diese
> Nachricht nicht für Sie bestimmt sein, so bitten wir Sie, sich mit uns per
> E-Mail oder telefonisch in Verbindung zu setzen.
>
> --------------------------------------------
>
> Should you have any further questions, please do not hesitate to contact us.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Volker A. Greimann
> - legal department -
>
> Key-Systems GmbH
> Im Oberen Werk 1
> 66386 St. Ingbert
> Tel.: +49 (0) 6894 - 9396 901
> Fax.: +49 (0) 6894 - 9396 851
> Email: vgreimann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> Web: www.key-systems.net / www.RRPproxy.net
> www.domaindiscount24.com / www.BrandShelter.com
>
> Follow us on Twitter or join our fan community on Facebook and stay updated:
> www.key-systems.net/facebook
> www.twitter.com/key_systems
>
> CEO: Alexander Siffrin
> Registration No.: HR B 1861 - Zweibruecken
> V.A.T. ID.: DE211006534
>
> This e-mail and its attachments is intended only for the person to whom it is
> addressed. Furthermore it is not permitted to publish any content of this
> email. You must not use, disclose, copy, print or rely on this e-mail. If an
> addressing or transmission error has misdirected this e-mail, kindly notify
> the author by replying to this e-mail or contacting us by telephone.
>
>
>
>
>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|