<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [gnso-vi-feb10] executive summary - proposal statements
- To: Tim Ruiz <tim@xxxxxxxxxxx>, "Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx" <Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [gnso-vi-feb10] executive summary - proposal statements
- From: Jeff Eckhaus <eckhaus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2010 09:31:44 -0700
Agree with Tim and Richard on this. Let's refrain from using terms like "strong
support" and "overall agreement", or even "consensus, since I do not believe we
have not had consensus on one item Only issue is I now I have to take out the
terms awesome, breathtaking and awe-inspiring from my summary.
Jeff Eckhaus
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Tim Ruiz
Sent: Friday, July 16, 2010 9:19 AM
To: Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [gnso-vi-feb10] executive summary - proposal statements
I agree with Richard on this. If we're going to allow attempts to get each of
our own pet views a little more steam in the report, we'll be arguing about
this forever. In the meantime, I'll be working on a signature campaign for RACK
just to be safe ;-)
Tim
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: [gnso-vi-feb10] executive summary - proposal statements
From: Richard Tindal <richardtindal@xxxxxx>
Date: Fri, July 16, 2010 11:04 am
To: Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx
Wanted to amplify the point i made on the call today
Executive summaries can be very powerful things as many will just read that
portion of the document.
Given this, I don't think the summaries we provide for each of our proposals
should include any words about the level of support or endorsement for our
proposals.
Kristina - I understand the response you made to this, but i just don't think
we'll get agreement on how support should be characterized. I think we'll get
into protracted and unsolvable debate over adjectives like 'some', 'many',
'good', 'broad', 'strong' etc. Even a seemingly benign statement like 'there
was support from xyz' is going to be debated as support for one piece of a
proposal doesnt necessarily mean support for all pieces.
My strong preference is to leave such descriptions of support out of the
proposal description.
RT
Please NOTE: This electronic message, including any attachments, may include
privileged, confidential and/or inside information owned by Demand Media, Inc.
Any distribution or use of this communication by anyone other than the intended
recipient(s) is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you are not the
intended recipient, please notify the sender by replying to this message and
then delete it from your system. Thank you.
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|