<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[gnso-vi-feb10] major conclusion from the report-drafting/review call -- schedule too tight, we need to back off
- To: Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx
- Subject: [gnso-vi-feb10] major conclusion from the report-drafting/review call -- schedule too tight, we need to back off
- From: "Mike O'Connor" <mike@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2010 11:06:38 -0500
hi all,
a quick note to bring you all up to speed with where things are after the
report-review call this morning.
there was consensus.
this is too tight a schedule. we're going to set the "release the report to
public comment" deadline back a week to allow all of us the time we need to get
this draft in shape. we've all worked too hard to get here -- we need to make
sure that our draft is in better shape before we release it.
Roberto and i are working on a short-interval schedule of what needs to happen
by when. here are a few things that need to happen by the end of the day today
that i'll mention here, and i'll push out the rest of the schedule once Roberto
and i have had a chance to push it back and forth a couple times.
confirm this schedule with senior staff (acknowledging that the report does not
contain policy recommendations, that the Council may very likely delay a
decision, that the Board will have access to our report regardless, etc.) -
Margie
publish short-interval schedule for the week's work - Mikey/Roberto/leaders
launch discussion of "rules for proposal summaries" (length, whether or not to
refer to levels of support, etc.) -- proposal and principle drafting-teams
this last one is the one for the drafting teams to focus on. i'll kick off a
thread for this in a minute.
thanks all,
mikey
- - - - - - - - -
phone 651-647-6109
fax 866-280-2356
web http://www.haven2.com
handle OConnorStP (ID for public places like Twitter, Facebook, Google, etc.)
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|