<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[gnso-vi-feb10] RE: First Draft of VI Initial Report v.1
- To: "Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx" <Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [gnso-vi-feb10] RE: First Draft of VI Initial Report v.1
- From: Milton L Mueller <mueller@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2010 11:03:51 -0400
Good comment, Jean-Christophe. I agree. We do have consensus that DAGv4
is not the right solution, actually. And we do have some kind of vague
consensus that if something restrictive like DAGv4 is imposed, there
should be exceptions.
> > -----Original Message-----
> >
> > Let's not forget that the "default position" was designed as a
> fallback
> > we "didn't get our act together"... We DID reach agreements on several
> > aspects, I'd just like it to be said more clearly.
> >
> > JC
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|