ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[gnso-vi-feb10]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] ORP in less than 200 words

  • To: "Mike O'Connor" <mike@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] ORP in less than 200 words
  • From: Jean Christophe VIGNES <jcvignes@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2010 18:23:57 +0200

Dear Mikey,

The Poll is a valid argument, although I'm not sure if Polling in itself is
enough to make a proposal "more worthy" or not.

As for the "level of scrutinity" however, I beg to differ: the Open Registry
Proposal was sent to the list, as the others, discussed on the list by many
as well as during our Brussels meeting... So it was scrutinized alright.

Among other things, I believe the fact that ORP has a strong Registrar
support makes it worthy of interest and consideration, as was (in a
different category) the recent IPC language.

The final decision is, obviously, yours and Roberto's, but I wanted to be
heard all the same.

Jean-Christophe


Le 19/07/10 18:06, « Mike O'Connor » <mike@xxxxxxxxxx> a écrit :

>
> hi Volker,
>
> i think this goes in the same category as Amadeu's note earlier in the day --
> i'm not sure what we're going to do with this, but i don't think it's fair to
> the WG to put it in Section 6.  we haven't subjected this proposal to the same
> level of scrutiny, and we haven't polled on it.
>
> again, sorry to be the bearer of bad news,
>
> mikey
>
>
> On Jul 19, 2010, at 10:18 AM, Volker Greimann - Key-Systems GmbH wrote:
>
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I hereby submit the bullet-point summary of the Open Registrar Proposal in
>> less than 200 words. We, the original proponents feel that the proposal got
>> significant support, and while we did not push it to the foreground in the
>> past weeks and tried to build support for a compromise position, none of the
>> current proposals reflect our vision of an open framework with equal
>> opportunities for all parties involved in the new gTLD process. We believe
>> the report should be as complete as possible, and not just limited to the
>> recently discussed or polled positions.
>>
>> Without further ado, the condensed proposal:
>>
>> Open Proposal:
>>
>> Basic premise:
>> - full cross-ownership and vertical integration of registries with
>>  registrars (ccTLD model)
>> - equal registrar access (Recommendation 19)
>> - registrars can provide registry services as technical provider, under
>>  seperate ICANN agreement, if necessary
>>
>> Goal:
>>   -more innovation
>>   -enabling diverse business/operational models
>>   -less or no need for exceptions
>>
>> Fighting abuse and non-compliance (gaming) by:
>>   -maintaining the requirement of all new TLDs for equal registrar
>> access
>>         -mandatory
>> -registry may act as registrar in own TLD
>>         -no discrimination between registrars
>>         -equal connections, chances for new regs
>>         -first-come, first-serve on all requests
>>         -adequate support levels
>>   -establishment of a strong yet flexible compliance framework
>> -clear rules of conduct
>>         -reactive AND pro-active approach to abuse
>>         -information firewalls or obligation to make generally
>>  available information prone to abuse
>>         -beefed-up (and well funded) ICANN compliance and enforcement
>> teams
>>               -random compliance checks
>>               -compliance monitored by ICANN
>>               -compliance also monitored by competitors (registrars,
>> registries)
>>   -enforcement of an effective and strict penalty system based on
>>    contractual agreements
>>         -financial penalties
>>         -restrictions or limits upon operation
>>         -suspension of certain functions
>>         -termination of accreditation/delegation agreement
>>
>> Possible exceptions:
>> -true SRSU: equal registrar access requirement waived (for example
>>  single-user dotBrands)
>> -other exceptions not required as the proposal allows for varied
>> business models
>>
>>
>> The
>
> - - - - - - - - -
> phone  651-647-6109
> fax    866-280-2356
> web  http://www.haven2.com
> handle OConnorStP (ID for public places like Twitter, Facebook, Google, etc.)
>
>

______________________
Jean-Christophe Vignes

Executive Vice-President & General Counsel
DCL Group
2, rue Léon Laval
L-3372 Leudelange

Tel.:  +352  20 200 123
Mobile : +352 691 600 424
Fax.:   +352 20 300 123
Mailto: JCVignes@xxxxxxxxxxx

www.datacenter.eu   | www.eurodns.com   | www.voipgate.com


--------------------------------------------------------

This e-mail and any attached files are confidential and intended solely for the 
use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have 
received this e-mail by mistake, please notify the sender immediately and 
delete it from your system. You must not copy the message or disclose its 
contents to anyone.

Think of the environment: don't print this e-mail unless you really need to.

--------------------------------------------------------




<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy