<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [gnso-vi-feb10] RACK+ in 200 words or less
- To: "briancute@xxxxxxxxxxxx" <briancute@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx" <Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [gnso-vi-feb10] RACK+ in 200 words or less
- From: "Neuman, Jeff" <Jeff.Neuman@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2010 12:59:04 -0400
Wow, I just got blasted by RACKers for my statement of advocacy. Then I see in
this document in big bold letters at the top:
"In the interest of registrants, registrars and registries of all sizes, this
proposal recommends the continuation of ICANN's current policy of separation
between registries and registrars."
Hello, kettle, this is pot..."you're black". (FYI, that is a variation of the
"Pot calling the Kettle black."
Richard and Tim - I assume your position is to take out that sentence!
Jeffrey J. Neuman
Neustar, Inc. / Vice President, Law & Policy
________________________________
The information contained in this e-mail message is intended only for the use
of the recipient(s) named above and may contain confidential and/or privileged
information. If you are not the intended recipient you have received this
e-mail message in error and any review, dissemination, distribution, or copying
of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication
in error, please notify us immediately and delete the original message.
From: owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Brian Cute
Sent: Monday, July 19, 2010 12:48 PM
To: Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: [gnso-vi-feb10] RACK+ in 200 words or less
Attached is the RACK+ proposal in summary form as requested.
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|