Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] RACK+ in 200 words or less

[Richard Tindal <richardtindal@xxxxxx>]

yes


On Jul 19, 2010, at 9:59 AM, Neuman, Jeff wrote:

> Wow, I just got blasted by RACKers for my statement of advocacy.  Then I see 
> in this document in big bold letters at the top:
>  
> “In the interest of registrants, registrars and registries of all sizes, this 
> proposal recommends the continuation of ICANN’s current policy of separation 
> between registries and registrars.”
>  
>  
> Hello, kettle, this is pot…”you’re black”.  (FYI, that is a variation of the 
> “Pot calling the Kettle black.”
>  
> Richard and Tim – I assume your position is to take out that sentence!
>  
> Jeffrey J. Neuman 
> Neustar, Inc. / Vice President, Law & Policy
> 
> The information contained in this e-mail message is intended only for the use 
> of the recipient(s) named above and may contain confidential and/or 
> privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient you have 
> received this e-mail message in error and any review, dissemination, 
> distribution, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have 
> received this communication in error, please notify us immediately and delete 
> the original message.
>  
>  
> From: owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx] On 
> Behalf Of Brian Cute
> Sent: Monday, July 19, 2010 12:48 PM
> To: Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [gnso-vi-feb10] RACK+ in 200 words or less
>  
> Attached is the RACK+ proposal in summary form as requested.