RE: [gnso-vi-feb10] RACK+ in 200 words or less

["Tim Ruiz" <tim@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

It should be "This proposal recommends the continuation of ICANN’s
current policy of separation between registries and registrars.”


Tim

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] RACK+ in 200 words or less
From: Richard Tindal <richardtindal@xxxxxx>
Date: Mon, July 19, 2010 12:10 pm
To: Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx

yes


On Jul 19, 2010, at 9:59 AM, Neuman, Jeff wrote:

Wow, I just got blasted by RACKers for my statement of advocacy.  Then I
see in this document in big bold letters at the top:
 
“In the interest of registrants, registrars and registries of all
sizes, this proposal recommends the continuation of ICANN’s current
policy of separation between registries and registrars.”
 
 
Hello, kettle, this is pot…”you’re black”.  (FYI, that is a
variation of the “Pot calling the Kettle black.”
 
Richard and Tim – I assume your position is to take out that sentence!
 
Jeffrey J. Neuman 
Neustar, Inc. / Vice President, Law & Policy







The information contained in this e-mail message is intended only for
the use of the recipient(s) named above and may contain confidential
and/or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient you
have received this e-mail message in error and any review,
dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message is strictly
prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please
notify us immediately and delete the original message.
 

 
From: owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Brian Cute
Sent: Monday, July 19, 2010 12:48 PM
To: Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: [gnso-vi-feb10] RACK+ in 200 words or less


 
Attached is the RACK+ proposal in summary form as requested.