ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[gnso-vi-feb10]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [gnso-vi-feb10] process

  • To: <Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: RE: [gnso-vi-feb10] process
  • From: "Thomas Barrett - EnCirca" <tbarrett@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2010 15:38:02 -0400

Avri,

Thanks for clarifying.

It is not too late with articulating your view on where the process took the
wrong turn.

Tom
 

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Avri Doria
Sent: Monday, July 19, 2010 3:23 PM
To: Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] process



hi,

Humor and sarcasm aside*, my issue is not disagreement on the substance.  I
have no issue with the variety of opinion expressed in the report.

My issue will be primarily with the process of the WG and especially the
process assembling this report and specifically with information that was
suppressed from the report.  

a.


* no, i am _not_ asking the chairs to forbid sarcasm - though perhaps i
should as yet another way to suppress dialogue, which does seem to be the
general trend in this group - if you don't like what someome says, then get
it prohibited or removed from the report.




<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy