<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[gnso-vi-feb10] BRU1 - 200ish word summary
- To: Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx
- Subject: [gnso-vi-feb10] BRU1 - 200ish word summary
- From: Richard Tindal <richardtindal@xxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2010 22:34:50 -0700
All,
Here's a draft summary of BRU1 for comment.
RT
=======================================================================================================================================================
BRU 1
The BRU1 sub-group recommends a 15% cross ownership limit between: (i)
registries/ registry service providers (RSPs); (ii) registrars/ resellers;
and (iii) their Affiliates. This limit applies regardless of the TLD(s)
offered by the parties. Irrespective of ownership levels control (as defined
by DAG4) may never occur. For example, a registrar may never control a
registry, even if it has only 15% ownership of that registry.
Although there is not consensus within the sub-group on this, a majority of
participants are sympathetic to an exception for RSPs who undertake a form of
accreditation directly with ICANN. Participating RSPs would agree to a set of
significant sanctions should they be found in breach of their obligations (for
such things as the confidentiality of registry data). The sub-group views this
exception as worthy of further consideration.
BRU1 defines an SRSU TLD as one where: (a) the registry is the registrant for
all second level names; and (b) the use of names in terms of website content,
email control, or any other application associated with the domains is
exercised only by the registry. BRU1 believes the registry contract (Section
2.6 'Reserved Names') should be amended to specifically allow for the SRSU
model. If Section 2.6 cannot be amended BRU1 supports an exception that allows
an SRSU registry to own a registrar in its TLD, and a waiver of equivalent
access obligations on that registry.
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|